 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
01-26-2014, 08:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Even beyond differences in the numerical scoring scales, I think comparing PSA v. SGC is apples to oranges since the companies seem to assign different "weights" to different kinds of imperfections.
For example, I have found that for PSA corners are a bigger deal whereas for SGC centering is a bigger deal. So if you have a crease free T206 with 80/20 centering and strong corners, PSA might give you a 5 whereas SGC will only give you a 4 (50). On the other hand, if you have a crease free T206 with 50/50 centering and soft corners, SGC might give you a 5 (60) whereas PSA will knock you down to a 4. Just my personal experience. Edited to add: I'm sure there are counterexamples; i'm just talking in generalities. Last edited by sreader3; 01-26-2014 at 08:29 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New SGC Grading scale updates!! | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 07-19-2012 06:39 AM |
| which auction house have the sliding BP scale? | chaddurbin | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-26-2010 07:56 AM |
| my new and improved 4-point grading scale | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-05-2009 07:43 AM |
| Beckett's Grading Scale | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-22-2009 09:09 PM |
| World's Largest to Scale bat | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 02-20-2009 08:03 PM |
Threaded Mode