Hey folks....reprising my case for the "12 factor" in the T206 structure

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Tao_Moko

Until a sheet is discovered or recreated there can only be theory. I don't have any issue with the factor of 12 because it's seemingly evident. I also like Erick's approach and use of technology using scraps and miscuts to create a sheet. I may be late to the game but can you combine both efforts? Trying to prove the other right may be the way we get to the bottom of this.

Eric S

I like your term "seemingly evident" to describe my "12 factor".

One of the problems I have with Erick's approach is that the dimensions of the Lash p/c have not been stated, which would provide a frame of reference.

It appears to me to be the size of a 3" x 5" card, but I'm not sure of this.

Another problem is that the various layouts in the diagrams presented are of an arbitrary nature. It's just guesswork as to how many of these Lash p/c's
overlayed the hypothetical T206 scrap sheet.




TED Z
.