|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Still waiting...
Are you are saying that within a series (Piedmont 350 in this instance) that the layouts did or did not change? If you believe they did not change, then it's been demonstrated that there are other cards adjacent to those that you say appeared together and therefore your assertion is incorrect. If you believe that they did change, then how can you assert beyond a reasonable doubt that they ever appeared together on a single sheet? Last edited by t206hound; 08-16-2014 at 01:41 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Topics for discussion re: t206 Printing and errors | Clark7781 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-17-2012 10:38 PM |
| T206 Backs Discussion, Part 215,256,559 | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2010 08:31 PM |
| E cards - what size sheet to store raw? | tiger8mush | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2010 01:46 PM |
| T206 Printing Discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2007 07:01 AM |
| For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-02-2006 10:57 AM |