|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I didn't want to get of topic in the other thread so I'll post my
opinion here. I don't think any of the Sweeney's are missing red ink all of the ones that I've seen have evidence of scrapbook removal or light exposure. Some like yours were a more successful soak but the evidence of a soak is still there. I picked up this Dubuc out of curiosity because it was cheap, it had a pretty clean back and the red was faded. As soon as I had it in hand I could tell it had been soaked. Dubuc.jpgDubuc Back.jpg Dubuc Side Veiw 2.jpg Dubuc Side Veiw.jpg If you're scanning a card and it doesn't lay flat on the scanner bed you can bet it has been soaked at some point even some of the worst beaters will lay flat if they haven't been soaked. It's not just the Sweeney's. Here are some of the "missing ink" T206's on ebay, all of the ones missing red in the lettering have scrapbook or light exposure evidence. https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odk...g+ink&_sacat=0 Last edited by Pat R; 03-16-2018 at 04:25 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Sweeney Missing B or No? | VintageBling | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-07-2016 11:12 AM |
| T206 Bill Sweeney No "B" variation | Max_Bear_31 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-12-2010 01:29 PM |
| WTB T206 Bill Sweeney Broadleaf 350 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-15-2008 08:24 PM |
| Bill Sweeney SGC 40 T206 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-02-2007 06:14 PM |
| No Help on Sweeney T206 "Missing Ink?" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-09-2005 10:56 PM |