|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice card, and I see nothing wrong with it. Hope you were able to remove the wax. I do think especially in mid-grade - that there are a lot of still very nice vintage cards to be had with qualifiers that make them turn out to be hugely discounted. I recently got a '53 Topps Warren Spahn that was graded PSA 5 (MC). It was definitely OC (which doesn't bother me) but whether or not truly MC was debatable. It has a smooth surface and sharp corners. How many 5's from '53 have sharp corners? I got it at least $30 cheaper than other non-qualified PSA 5's I had looked at. Feels like a deal to me.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 07-01-2018 at 10:37 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC and wax stains | bnorth | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 09-22-2016 07:51 PM |
| 51 Bowman -Wax stains or Gum stains? | pawpawdiv9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-04-2015 11:06 PM |
| Well, the stains look authentic........ | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-04-2014 09:38 AM |
| Wow! Stains added. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-12-2012 11:58 AM |
| Gum Stains | almostdone | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-17-2011 09:25 PM |