Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyCoxDodgers3B
I've taken flak about it over the years, but I've always said pretty much the above about the Stones. In the 60's, they were something else; always trying new ideas and going so many different directions at the same time. Having to compete with the Beatles (like everybody else) likely forced them to bring their "A" game. Then, the 70's rolled around. For me, their material sounds too similar after the 1960's. Too many drugs and less creative juices/effort. But that's just my perception; it's neither right or wrong. The band is known for its age-defying longevity, but I really wonder what sort of extra reverence they may have been afforded if they had met their end after, say, Altamont and never reunited. 60's Stones were a thing of strange beauty.
|
Here's another one of my favourite Stones' photos from the 1960's:
__________________
That government governs best that governs least.
Last edited by Balticfox; 10-01-2025 at 09:16 PM.
|