Worst Topps set for photos? - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2025, 07:20 PM
Lucas00's Avatar
Lucas00 Lucas00 is offline
Lüc@s Dëwėãšę
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,115
Default

I’m going with Mark on anything past 1971. But in particular anything past 1975.

I think its pretty crazy 58 is a disliked set based on headshots, I guess people don’t like color. 1953 topps is THE headshot set. So it should be widely disliked as well, and if I remember correctly from a thread several years ago, it was many peoples least favorite set from the 50s. Which I probably agree with, not because of the headshots, because I don’t like the art style.
__________________
I have done deals with many of the active n54ers. Sometimes I sell cool things that you don't see every day.

My Red Schoendienst collection- https://imageevent.com/lucas00/redsc...enstcollection
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2025, 09:05 PM
Balticfox's Avatar
Balticfox Balticfox is offline
V@idotas J0nynas
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas00 View Post
I think its pretty crazy 58 is a disliked set based on headshots, I guess people don’t like color.
Love the color! The headshots not so much.

__________________
That government governs best that governs least.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-20-2025, 08:59 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas00 View Post
I’m going with Mark on anything past 1971. But in particular anything past 1975.

I think its pretty crazy 58 is a disliked set based on headshots, I guess people don’t like color. 1953 topps is THE headshot set. So it should be widely disliked as well, and if I remember correctly from a thread several years ago, it was many peoples least favorite set from the 50s. Which I probably agree with, not because of the headshots, because I don’t like the art style.
I agree with this. 1958 is bad because of too many headshots. Don't forget the "armless" cropping of Gino Cimoli. However, the Clemente is one of the best looking Topps cards ever. The Mays AS and Mantle AS are awesome, and we get the first Musial and last Williams.

1969 is bad because of too many hatless players and reused photos. However, there are plenty of nice cards in the low series, Bench, Banks, Brock, Clemente, Gibson, Kaline & F. Robinson. The last 3 series we get the 1969 spring training photos and players in uniform for the 4 expansion teams.

I dislike 1953 more because of too many headshots and the poor artwork. The Whitey Ford may be the worst. I know this will be a minority opinion, but I dislike the photos for 1952 Topps even more than 1958 and 1969. Again too many headshots and the colorizing of the black and white photos has always looked weird to me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-20-2025, 09:23 AM
Brent G.'s Avatar
Brent G. Brent G. is online now
Br.en+ G!@sg0w
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Indiana native; Illinois resident
Posts: 1,029
Default

I mean, is there a worse card for a hall of famer than that Reggie?? People with no experience in my sophomore year of high school photo journalism class shot better action shots of gym class.
__________________
__________________

Collecting Indianapolis-related pre-war and rare regionals, Jim Thorpe, and other vintage thru '80s

Successful deals with Kingcobb, Harford20, darwinbulldog, iwantitiwinit, helfrich91, kaddyshack, Marckus99, D. Bergin, Commodus the Great, Moonlight Graham, orioles70, adoo1, Nilo, JollyElm, DJCollector1, angolajones, timn1, jh691626, NiceDocter, h2oya311, orioles93, thecapeleague, gkrodg00, no10pin, Scon0072, cmoore330, Luke, wawazat

Last edited by Brent G.; 02-20-2025 at 09:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-20-2025, 12:05 PM
puckpaul puckpaul is offline
P.aul Orl,in
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 832
Default

The photos are mostly portraits, but with the overall design being so ugly, i find 1974 the worst. Collected it as a kid and the passage of time has not made me the slightest bit nostalgic for it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-20-2025, 05:45 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 8,313
Default

What adds to the utter horror of the 1973 Topps Reggie photo is that's his MVP year!!!
Thus, the card naturally gets featured so much more often than any of his other non-rookie cards!!!! You simply can't avoid the squished face craziness!!!!!!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2025, 05:48 PM
Chicosbailbonds's Avatar
Chicosbailbonds Chicosbailbonds is offline
Joseph Mie.lke
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 183
Default

68-69 were the worst. The one thing about the 73's are the action shots were similar to 71 and 72. It was the technology of the day.

Last edited by Chicosbailbonds; 02-20-2025 at 05:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2025, 06:18 PM
Brent G.'s Avatar
Brent G. Brent G. is online now
Br.en+ G!@sg0w
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Indiana native; Illinois resident
Posts: 1,029
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicosbailbonds View Post
68-69 were the worst. The one thing about the 73's are the action shots were similar to 71 and 72. It was the technology of the day.
There are plenty of great action shots long before 1973, but apparently the Topps people had no idea what film and equipment to use. Maybe they should’ve called Sports Illustrated.
__________________
__________________

Collecting Indianapolis-related pre-war and rare regionals, Jim Thorpe, and other vintage thru '80s

Successful deals with Kingcobb, Harford20, darwinbulldog, iwantitiwinit, helfrich91, kaddyshack, Marckus99, D. Bergin, Commodus the Great, Moonlight Graham, orioles70, adoo1, Nilo, JollyElm, DJCollector1, angolajones, timn1, jh691626, NiceDocter, h2oya311, orioles93, thecapeleague, gkrodg00, no10pin, Scon0072, cmoore330, Luke, wawazat

Last edited by Brent G.; 02-20-2025 at 06:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2025, 02:50 PM
Mark17's Avatar
Mark17 Mark17 is offline
M@rk S@tterstr0m
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post

1969 is bad because of too many hatless players and reused photos.
When we were kids, we also felt the 1969 design was basically a copy of 1968, with that color circle.

So overall I would say 1969 was the laziest effort Topps put out.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Topps issue has the worst centering? frankhardy Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 29 01-09-2023 04:12 PM
Vote! Worst Topps produced set of the 50's almostdone Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 60 12-27-2015 08:03 PM
Worst Topps card 1952-1979 jason.1969 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 37 11-09-2015 09:16 PM
Vote!! The worst Topps produced set of the 1970's almostdone Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 17 07-23-2015 11:07 PM
3 best. 3 worst Topps issues kailes2872 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 62 03-06-2014 05:34 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 AM.


ebay GSB