 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30
02-18-2014, 10:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Why do we, or why does the hobby need a single "top card" or Holy Grail? Nothing wrong with having 2 or even 3 cards known as the hobby's best, with no clear-cut, consensus favorite. I think the Wagner and the BN Ruth are just that -- evenly matched and both worthy of the title "Hobby's Best/Most Valuable Card".
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E 103 Cobb, Wagner and $ for M 101 Ruth | LincolnVT | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-23-2013 03:37 PM |
| E 103 Wagner, M 101 Ruth | LincolnVT | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2013 07:29 PM |
| A little bit of everything - Ruth, Johnson, Wagner, etc. | David Halpen | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 8 | 05-19-2009 11:11 PM |
| Biggest bucks: Wagner or Ruth? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 04-20-2008 05:51 AM |
| $600-700 to spend on best Ruth or Wagner | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 09-06-2006 05:26 PM |
Threaded Mode