NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-17-2014, 01:44 AM
drumback drumback is offline
Mark Peavey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 956
Default Ruth or Wagner

To me, the BN Ruth isn't really a card. It's a schedule. And it's kind of ugly as well. In any color. Looks like it could have been printed in the seventies. I would choose Wagner. Not even close.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-17-2014, 01:52 AM
itjclarke's Avatar
itjclarke itjclarke is offline
I@n Cl@rke
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drumback View Post
And it's kind of ugly as well. In any color. Looks like it could have been printed in the seventies. I would choose Wagner. Not even close.
I agree. My immediate thought upon reading the OP was for the Ruth, but there's no comparison when looking at the two. Love T206 or not, the Wagner is a great looking card, and in my opinion a far better looking one than the Ruth.

That said, I'd be more thn happy with either.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-17-2014, 08:31 AM
I Only Smoke 4 the Cards's Avatar
I Only Smoke 4 the Cards I Only Smoke 4 the Cards is offline
Alex
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itjclarke View Post
I agree. My immediate thought upon reading the OP was for the Ruth, but there's no comparison when looking at the two. Love T206 or not, the Wagner is a great looking card, and in my opinion a far better looking one than the Ruth.



That said, I'd be more thn happy with either.

I actually think the Wagner is kind of ugly. He has an absolutely expressionless face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Tackling the Monster
T206 = 213/524
HOFs = 13/76
SLers = 33/48
Horizontals = 6/6

ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-17-2014, 09:33 AM
Vintageclout Vintageclout is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default Ruth vs. Wagner

Quote:
Originally Posted by drumback View Post
To me, the BN Ruth isn't really a card. It's a schedule. And it's kind of ugly as well. In any color. Looks like it could have been printed in the seventies. I would choose Wagner. Not even close.
Well said, indeed it is a schedule, but still Ruth's inaugural appearance on "some" cardboard issue. While I am as big as Ruth fan as anyone in the hobby and collect his cardboard rarities, in this instance I choose the Wagner. True, stances change over the course of time, but I highly doubt the Wagner will EVER be pushed aside as our hobby's Holy Grail. The original pricing escalation within the hobby was spearheaded by two cards; the T206 Wagner and 1952 Topps Mantle with the T206 Wagner the ultimate benchmark. True, the Ruth 1914 BN is scarcer, but sometimes excessive rarity can limit a card's emergence to the general public. Keep in mind it is "the public" that will ultimately dictate a card's desirability/value, and there are enough Wagner's available (with a scarcity factor still attached) to continue generating the necessary "hype" required for a "Holy Grail" baseball card.

Joe T.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E 103 Cobb, Wagner and $ for M 101 Ruth LincolnVT Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 0 03-23-2013 04:37 PM
E 103 Wagner, M 101 Ruth LincolnVT Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 0 03-04-2013 08:29 PM
A little bit of everything - Ruth, Johnson, Wagner, etc. David Halpen Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 8 05-20-2009 12:11 AM
Biggest bucks: Wagner or Ruth? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 04-20-2008 06:51 AM
$600-700 to spend on best Ruth or Wagner Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 1 09-06-2006 06:26 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:57 PM.


ebay GSB