![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I will tell you that I turned down 5k for my Ruth and Gehig pair below. It took me 7 years to find them. That said, mine ar ein very high end condition. However. a Ruth just sold in HYEE auction for 1300. I thought it would go for double. Also NOTE, I pay more for photos than the average Ben. ![]() That Ruth in HYEE would have been a good Ruth for someone looking for some "cream" IMO. The burkes are not as rare in theory as Conlons, Paul Thompsons, Bains, even single shot news service photos as Burke produced to sell to players as well as fans as we all know. However, I can tell you.. unsigned examples of these two shots are very rare as it relates to the demand. They are two of the most well known portraits of these two giants. I would say an 8x10 in the condition as my example could fetch 1500-2000 unsigned very easily at auction. If two serious photo guys are on it, probably more. The condition of Mark's example clearly hurt it. What did it sell for again? Again.. I hate to put prices on photos as there is no way to know. Someone could come on here and pull 600 out of the air and I would be like.. ok... sold in the wrong setting.. maybe. I am going off what I would have paid when I wanted one and what I have been offered(facts). Regarding the photo in question.. How much are you in it? You spend more money on top of that.. then how much are you in it for a re-conditioned one? My point is, it is not that bad... maybe get tape removed or just frame and matte out. If you have as much in it or close to one unconditioned it makes no sense.. especially if you are fine with it as is IMO. It just depends on what it is worth to you as you really are not going to be hurt either way as far as value goes. Photos are like art in that reconditioning is acceptable if done well. If one is altered and looks the same as one unaltered.. yeah. .it is worth less but still can bring high value. It doesn't automatically make it a psa "altered" worth less than a psa 1 card ![]() There I go... a ramblin man again. ![]()
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls." ~Ted Grant Www.weingartensvintage.com https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection Last edited by Forever Young; 02-25-2014 at 08:49 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photo of 5 Guys with a Wagner in the 70's | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 01-12-2014 09:32 AM |
Baseball card art/photo:gehrig 34 goudey or not gehrig 34 goudey.that is the question | Forever Young | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 31 | 12-20-2012 07:14 AM |
thanks. Question answered. You guys are the best. | cubsguy1969 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 12-01-2012 01:13 PM |
Since you guys nailed the last one, Please help with this photo | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 08-01-2008 12:17 PM |
Newest Pick-up and a question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 11-02-2004 11:30 AM |