|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow. All this because a company changed it's flip design? OCD really does go hand in hand with card collecting.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The slabs the cards are in are just as important as say, 1993 Sport Kings (or whatever particular set you are working on). Together, the cards and the holders compliment each other. And let's say you are not finished. Do you really want to have half the set in different looking holders? As silly as you think this dilema is, this is a very real problem for card collectors.
Last edited by bobbyw8469; 05-23-2014 at 12:50 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hate the New SGC Holder . Love the New Version of "Yesterday".
JP |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe they should have made a contest for the flip design. They could have set requirements, i.e it must have 4 lines, include SGC, etc. and had folks submit designs. Then take the top 3 designs and let people vote on their website. Winning design gets 10 free grades.
__________________
Numerous successful transactions on Net54, just ask for references. https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/gregr2 |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by MVSNYC; 05-23-2014 at 02:29 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Numerous successful transactions on Net54, just ask for references. https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/gregr2 |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Target has wrapped up internal studies and has determined that their target logo and color red is not necessary to convey the name of their store. It does nothing for their products or services, and it does not lower prices. It was an internal decision and they saw no need for a test market study. Joe G. had some good compromise ideas but Target just failed to listen. Target righteously determined you cant please everybody. The change will be implemented immediately.
Walmart loves their competitors’ choice and is keeping their blue branding. Starbuck’s is keeping their green. Color matters. Branding matters. Customers matter. Change is good. Bad change is bad. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Asi I have said from the beginning of this discussion, the flip. on first glance, appears as if belonged to a 2nd rate company,
And, as a person who has attended tons of shows overs the years, those flips do not stand out the way you expect them to, Perhaps. and PSA learned this when they first attempted to move to 1/2 grrades but had a near rebellion on their hands which was led by Jim Crandall (Davallilo on these boards) they had to wait and regroup and finally got those approved by a majority of their users. Sometimes, especially when the real importance (grading the card correctly, preventing the gaskets from having the card move around) of the grading comapny is overlooked, this could have been made into a great PR move by SGC. you know, disclosing some prospective flips and bringing them to this board's attention would not have taken away any corporate secrets nor would it have hurt in way. In favt, SGC would have been roundly cheered for its transprarency. And in today's world, that is a great PR help to have. Regards Rich Last edited by Rich Klein; 05-24-2014 at 04:03 PM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() On a serious note, the only nuance I have is wanting all my cards in a set to match. I don't want to have them in all different slabs. I want them to all be graded by one company, and I want the "flip" to match. That's it. Like someone stated earlier, maybe SGC is hoping to get rush of collectors wanting to get stuff in the new label. I can promise, I am not the only collector who feels this way. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's a LABEL.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
BTW. Above post is all in fun and meant to try to get a rise out of the majority. But I still say, Just let it go. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Dan Hicks Last edited by Gobucsmagic74; 05-24-2014 at 05:24 PM. Reason: added name |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nah. Having too much fun with the old guy telling me to get off his lawn.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
SGC gets a big fat "F" for failing on branding and marketing. If they had a thoughtful approach as to how this would roll out to collectors, why they were making the change, and being proactive in communicating before the new flips were ready, collectors would not be responding like they have. It's interesting (to me) that Leon is essentially being the spokesperson for SGC on many of these changes. SGC has the love of the pre-war collecting crowd. It would not have taken much to roll out these changes in an engaging way. The "surprise" factor on the announcement, along with the general lack of communication is what has largely pissed off this group of collectors, in my opinion. m |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Leon is doing his best to represent the N54 crowd & his engagement in discussions with SGC may be a win win for members here & SGC . if the poll here resembles other non N54 SGC's customers SGC would be making an error in their business model with a change most loyal customers don't like. My fingers are crossed Leon's efforts on our behalf pay off. I wish my emails to SGC received a response |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I would think , tho, that we would get more mileage if everyone would simply email Earl over at SGC. I have never known SGC to NOT listen to their customer base. I do like everything about the new flip - except for the sans Green Border. The very 1st photoshop design which incorporated the green border with the new flip looked absolutely fabulous to me and kept the SGC "look" intact. I would think this could easily be implemented on the SGC side.
__________________
My Monster Progess Complete Set......: 238 / 520 : 45% HOF Cards..........: 009 / 076 : 12% Southern League.: 000 / 048 : 00% Minor League......: 055 / 086 : 41% Portrait Cards......: 077 / 180 : 43% Horizontal Cards.: 000 / 006 : 00% |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Response | JP21 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 147 | 09-03-2013 10:01 AM |
| Response to Allegations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 07-28-2012 02:39 PM |
| SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2007 07:35 PM |
| SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-30-2006 09:27 PM |
| Interesting response to PSA grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-22-2005 04:35 PM |