![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the key issue what is “good faith” mean in the sports card industry / hobby?
If a card has been trimmed or recolored (e.g., touched up), I think most agree that the standard is disclosure. If wax or dirt has been rubbed off a card, I think the standard is that non-disclosure is okay. But that’s only my opinion. Card soaking? Not sure if there is a standard. Now if more and more cards are graded and found to have been “soaked,” then the standard would be more clear. What if a card has been “restored.” Take the Hans Wagner card in this thread as an example. I think most would agree that disclosure is required. However, should that affect the value? I think it does reduce value to a certain degree. Sports card enthusiasts value originality and condition, so the value will be negatively affected to some degree. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Article on card restoration | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 04-12-2018 04:50 AM |
B4 and after pics of card restoration | Fred | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-10-2010 11:31 PM |
Card restoration post | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-11-2007 01:38 PM |
Card Restoration Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-11-2004 06:54 PM |
cabinet card restoration | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-02-2002 01:27 AM |