![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bob Rodgers is under Bobby Richardson. A lot of these miscuts don't show the color band because the color band wasn't printed aligned with the black border lines. I found a Richardson with yellow above him but I have no doubt it's a red Ferrara with a color separation.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is what's holding up the whole layout, Steve Barber has an Indian/Phillie above him that I believe is Phil Linz but every time I get to that point Barber comes out under Lenny Green which can't be right. There is a flaw somewhere in our previous columns.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thought I posted this a few days ago - but I think this is certainly Phil Linz over Barber because of the unique properties of the visible black border. This should give us a complete column of (in no particular order) Linz, Barber, Kline, Roznovsky, Coleman, Braves Rookies, Gibbon.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 02-09-2025 at 06:23 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm fairly certain that the column cards you posted can't be completely accurate because Linz is below a green banner card.
We have the pattern of Linz-Barber-Rovnovsky-Kline, and the other three you mentioned are in the order of: Gibbon-Braves RS-Coleman. That would force Coleman (Blue banner) to be above Linz, which doesn't seem to match this miscut. I think it is possible, albeit NOT confirmed, that the pattern of Face-Bailey-McDaniel is above Linz. 1966_522_WF-SF.jpg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amazing work Kevin,Cliff, and dewey!!!!!!!!!!
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I found this miscut Dennis Bennett in eBay's sold items, it looks like the red of a Dodger/Yankee but there aren't any of those really available. It would make sense if it is orange and it is Hoyt Wilhelm above him.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first guess would be a White Sox/Cub, but like you say it could also be Dodger/Yankee.
Notice the reverse miscut...not a sliver of the salmon color, yet the full right edge of the black border and, I think, clear specks of white indicating we're seeing the full thickness and it is one of the thinner borders. I went through all available (to my counting) Dodgers/Yankees AND White Sox Cubs, and could find no card that had the offset of the salmon from the black to this degree, to include Wilhelm which shows a slight offset. Then I went through ALL the Yankees/Dodgers and Cubs/White Sox just for kicks - it could only be two. The first is Don Buford, but he is safely ensconced elsewhere. The other is Steve Hamilton, but I don't think there is any way any of us think we could have messed up the right edge so badly. What if we expanded a bit - is there any chance the card above Bennett could be, like Bennett, a pink Red Sox or Pirate? Because Bob Bailey would fit that reverse miscut perfectly, IMHO. With the color issues observed on a couple of those Aaron's I posted a couple weeks ago, can it be out of the question? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I sincerely hope that it is a color shift, and that Bennett is below Wilhelm (which is where I tentatively placed him). Otherwise, I have to blow up everything about this layout and start again from scratch. LOL
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
1966_486_color_shift.jpg |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Larry Bearnarth is above George Banks. Banks is above Lenny Green. Now if we only knew who is above Bearnarth and under Green...
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a ton of miscuts from 1966. Is this project settled or do I need to dig through my stack for anything to help out this puzzle?....big john
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey! I have so much confidence in our reconstructed 66 6th slits that I posted them on my 1966 Topps page!
(but please post your miscut images here!) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |