![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jodi Birkholm
My thoughts exactly. I was thinking of the '41 set. As you say, there are the commemorative cards such as Shoeless Joe, which have always been pricey and wholly ill-fitting in that otherwise gorgeous set. It's still my favorite set out of the three due to its size and depiction of several lesser-name players and the fact that I knew perhaps 12 of the players in that set. The '39's are less appealing to me due to their lack of player names on the front (and, of course the high dollar cards). I was never much for the '41 issue, either, but it would certainly be the cheapest to complete. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice NM-M sets 80s-90s | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2009 09:08 PM |
Economic Effects... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-23-2008 07:09 AM |
Sets that aren't supposed to be that tough but are to you | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-10-2008 11:35 AM |
How tough are these sets? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-04-2007 05:59 PM |
Wanted some tough E-cards to finish some sets | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-05-2005 03:24 PM |