 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27
11-12-2010, 11:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I still don't quite get the exclusion attitude.
A good number of the guys on this list are better then many players already in the HOF. Players that have been in the HOF for decades. It's not like this would be a sudden watering down. It's seems a lot of people want to impose their own strict criteria to an establishment that never held to that criteria to begin with. Pretty ridiculous calling ballplayers who were Top 5 in their League at their position for the better part of a decade or more as "Just Better Then Average" or "Very Good". 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hall of Fame Veterans Committee Ballot | paul | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-15-2009 07:43 PM |
| Veterans Committee Election | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-30-2007 04:32 AM |
| HOF Veterans Committee Procedure Changed Significantly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-30-2007 08:12 PM |
| Veterans Committee Predictions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-28-2007 10:17 AM |
| Veterans' Committee Nominees | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 06-18-2006 07:53 AM |
Threaded Mode