![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So do you actually believe there's any chance it's real?
Having seen the black and white pic of it slabbed I still don't buy it. There's no or nearly no border to the image area, which is typical of a reprint. Even the proof has a clear border. The name and team are darker than the "Pittsburg" on the uniform. On all the pics I have of known real Wagners that lettering is either the same or lighter. There's a serious loss of detail above TSB on the uniform. A lack of detail seen on no other Wagner. Loss of detail is typical of a rescreened printing (Read reprint) The aging is very atypical of actual aging. The aging IS typical of a modern reprint dipped in tea or something similar. That highlights cracks in the glosscoat, which is what we see on the card in question. It appears to have a slight diamond cut, not unusual for a T206 ....But on the sides which is unusual if not unique for a T206 So if we're to believe it's real then we also have to believe that a very early borderless proof printed from a stone etched entirely differently than any other T206 including unreleased players was somehow finished with the production back as NO other proofs were, and glosscoated as only a very few T206s were(Some of the Cobb backs are the only glosscoated ones I've heard of) And then for some reason cut by machine like a production card, but differently than very nearly all of the production cards. And that that unique unreleased T206 just happened to be a Wagner. All that is objective. If my mother found that card I'd think it was a reprint. If it wasn't Wagner I'd think it was a reprint. Yes, the loupe can be handy. I use a 30X one myself, as well as high resolution scans if I want to have a good close look at something. And I use it more as my eyes get old. 20 years ago I could see the dot patterns on fakes without the loupe. Not so much today ![]() Yeah, I'd like to see a 1200DPI scan. Or have the card in hand. If only to remove the .000009% chance it might be real. Steve B Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Recent passing of a relative of Honus Wagner! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-14-2011 10:43 PM |
another wagner going on the block | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2008 06:21 PM |
Wagner HBO Real Sports...what do you think? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 08-24-2006 12:05 PM |
meant to follow up on the Wagner thread-- Context | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-06-2005 06:37 PM |
Cobb vs. Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 90 | 07-03-2005 10:50 AM |