|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who sucks the least? PSA or SGC? | |||
| PSA sucks the least! |
|
42 | 17.43% |
| SGC sucks the least! |
|
146 | 60.58% |
| They both suck equally! |
|
53 | 21.99% |
| Voters: 241. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like SGC for consistency, customer service and value, but can't argue that PSA brings more $$. Not sure that will change . . .
+1! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
+2 not sure too that will not change, many time when we talk about grading mistake etc, psa is almost everytime involve, so i am not sure this will not change
Last edited by g_vezina_c55; 06-25-2012 at 03:38 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Probably this has been done here already, but would be interesting for folks to make two lists (subjective):
What PSA tends to go easy on (very forgiving) in grading--and where it is very tough Same for SGC. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure PSA grades more cards which could explain more mistakes.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with Zach and Jake. PSA offers a better case, easier to read grading, and tracking that can easily be accessed on their website.
Rich |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Definitive makes me laugh on this subject. It is a religious debate with financial overtones.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The PSA case is slimer so more of them fit into my bin. SGC cases are too bulky looking.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
You misspelled slimier.
__________________
Check out my website www.imageevent.com/rgold |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like SGC for accuracy, but because of collectors affinity for the PSA Registry, they bring higher prices IMO. Also, I love how my cards stand out in the SGC holder. Drives me nuts in some of the PSA holders when the cards move all around.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Vintage Style
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." Last edited by HRBAKER; 06-25-2012 at 06:32 PM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Current score sgc 53, psa 11....i just simply don't get it. If we all are collectors and at some point want to sell, why would you not go with the grading company that brings the most money?
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like applesauce
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
John p...while i respect your opinion...you could not be more wrong!!!
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I say SGC.They havent let me down yet and they have great customer service in regards to submitting cards.Jason
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA has graded over 19 million cards. It would be crazy to say that they are all in the hands of investors or registry people.
I like both PSA & SGC to collect (I'm on both registries) and for re-sale, I've had very few problems with either & I'm glad both are in the hobby. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I cast my vote for GAI. And also for Mrs. Howell.
(if you are under 50 you probably don't get it). |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
My vote goes to PRO. With PRO you know what kind of cards their grading. With SGC & PSA, it's like buying a box of Cracker Jack. You never know what your going to get.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Couple of questions from a rookie:
1. Is it widely believed to be true that the name of the submitter can influence the grade?! 2. Are there any studies (reputable or otherwise) that have tested the popular claim that these companies grade inconsistently? It seems like it would be a great way to objectively identify which of the two is most consistent. 3. Is the experience and anticipation of waiting for a submitted card an enjoyable or scary one? In other words, do they tend to be too generous or picky? I'm not sure which way they lean, or if they're really all over the board. Thanks in advance. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
When I got the cards back in hand, I looked them over and showed them to my girlfriend, who tolerates the hobby even though she is into other things. I showed her some of the 4's, and she laughed "How did this get a '4'? This looks brand new!?!?!" I stated, "My thoughts exactly" and proceeded to crack them all out of the cases. If I had left them in the cases with the incorrect grades, buyers woulda focused on the grades and not the cards, and I would've received peanuts for the cards. Instead, I sold them raw, got a decent amount, and the bidder who bought the majority of the cards shipped them off to PSA, where he proceeded to get 7's and 8's. I did call SGC for clarification and was told that there must have been "minute cracking/crazing" that can't be seen with the naked eye, and can only be seen with extreme magnification! WTF!?!?! That whole lesson cost me around $400-$500. PS - I saved the scan of the "money card"
Last edited by bobbyw8469; 06-26-2012 at 06:04 PM. Reason: added picture |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1948 Leaf Football Master Set for Sale (#1 on PSA Set Registry) | OTWCards | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 06-23-2012 08:01 PM |
| PSA & SGC Diamond Stars for sale | heisman95 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-15-2010 04:51 PM |
| For sale Or Trade...Tons of High Grade Vintage Baseball...Many New Items | btcarfagno | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-06-2010 10:31 AM |
| Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 10:05 AM |
| Memory Lane Redux? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 04-18-2007 05:51 PM |