The National

[4reals]

I didn't realize the '06 National was out here, how did I miss that? Maybe that's why it did so poor...weak marketing.

If the weather is one of the issues in deciding, I hear that there's this wonderful new contraption called an air conditioner that makes buildings cold. It's really quite amazing!

Yeah, but seriously, temperature is never a problem in S.D., S.F., or Denver. I could understand Phoenix or Vegas getting crossed off the list for that problem.

[Jay Wolt]

The weather is probably not a consideration as the last Baltimore National was a steambox outside and probably will be again next week

[Steve_NY]

It comes down to economics.

Simply put, National spot holders are given the option to opt for missing one show every five years, and maintaining their priority count.

In 2006, many east coast dealers opted out of the National.

I would support a location that is more centrally located, but would have to opt out again if it was in the West Coast.

The fact remains that many of the premier dealers in the country are getting "older" and driving 3 days is not a pleasant thought.

I would also support a National show in 2 distinct locations -- one on the East Coast and one on the West Coast. Then I could decide to do one ofr both in any year.

These thoughts have all been debated before -- and we have what we have.

Steve

[Jaybird]

Originally Posted by Steve_NY

It comes down to economics.

Simply put, National spot holders are given the option to opt for missing one show every five years, and maintaining their priority count.

In 2006, many east coast dealers opted out of the National.

I would support a location that is more centrally located, but would have to opt out again if it was in the West Coast.

The fact remains that many of the premier dealers in the country are getting "older" and driving 3 days is not a pleasant thought.

I would also support a National show in 2 distinct locations -- one on the East Coast and one on the West Coast. Then I could decide to do one ofr both in any year.

These thoughts have all been debated before -- and we have what we have.

Steve

Interesting discussion. I'm not sure I like the East Coast/West Coast thing. I think it would dilute the show and possibly make both falter. I like the one National gathering where we can all get together. It really is a great time. I also don't mind traveling to different cities wherever they may be.

For some reason, maybe I'm crazy, but I think West Coasters are more open to travel than East Coasters. It's a generality but I think we're used to traveling more often to get somewhere and often by plane. Perhaps this isn't as much the case with East Coasters. Anyway, I'd just love to see a variety and a traveling show. Had a great time in Chicago, will do so in Baltimore.

Would also love to see Kansas City, Albuquerque, Oklahoma City, Austin, Tampa Bay, etc.

[4reals]

Unfortunately, it comes down to economics for me as well. I would love to be able to afford to fly across the country, get a hotel room and eat out for 3 or 4 days but I have a humble income and if I spent that kind of money I would have nothing left for card purchases.

You know, there could be good money made for East Coasters willing to shop at the National for West Coast guys. You know, just charge a small finders fee or something. Anything like that already exist?

[autograf]

I'm in Louisville, so we gotta Travel wherever it goes. It is more expensive to travel to West Coast for us. Typically, it's a 5 hour drive to Chicago or Cleveland from here, so those are great locations. Baltimore is a cheap plane ticket on Southwest $175-$200 from here and you can train it from the airport to the Inner Harbor for $10 or less without having to get a car. West coast show would cost $400-$500 plane ticket plus car for a week.....another $300-$400. I've been to every National since Atlanta 1992, so I'm going wherever it is.....hopefully. It just cuts down on what I can spend a little due to other expenses. One of my National buddies and I took our wives to Anaheim in 2006 and it was a great trip (but cost even MORE!). They could replace Cleveland....not much fun there anymore! I did like Baltimore last time and am looking forward to next week.......

[nolemmings]

Vegas would be an absolute blast. Otherwise San Diego is far and away the best pick IMO, since they seem to insist on holding the Convention the first week in August, when it is ridiculously hot here in Phoenix (Vegas too but who cares) and maybe too warm in LA. The Bay area would work too but it seems if you want guaranteed great weather with alternate things to do San Diego would work best. Denver might work, and I think centrally-located Kansas City would be great too--a really clean and fun city with of course great music and BBQ.

[mark evans]

Although I live in the D.C. suburbs, I agree that the West Coast folks get a raw deal. Perhaps Las Vegas would offer an attractive venue for everyone.

Hope to see all for dinner.