|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not saying I agree, I was trying to help answer the op's question. Obviously it's ridiculous to call the 1933 card of an aging Ruth his rookie card.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for all of your responses. I find it hard to accept a rookie card for someone who is a year way from retirement.
__________________
James Wymer Wymers Auction wymersauction.com Always accepting quality consignments |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The first red flag should have simply been the phrase "ebay seller". According to your average eBay seller, any Japanese card of a Japanese player is a rookie, any relatively early card of a player is a rookie and "1/1" can be applied to any card in existence.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1915 New York Yankees Player Contract with VITAL Babe Ruth tie in! | btcarfagno | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 05-27-2011 03:54 PM |
| question re: Babe Ruth photo | FourStrikes | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 05-03-2010 03:54 PM |
| 1916 Boston Store Babe Ruth Rookie? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-09-2008 07:03 PM |
| Babe Ruth 1934-1936 Batter Up Card R-318 #144 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-02-2005 08:54 AM |
| Question about a Babe Ruth card. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-25-2001 03:23 PM |