|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting card, for sure and a tough front/back combination. I just looked and out of ~250 Walsh's graded by SGC there are only 2 Old Mills. I thought mine was the only one in SGC's pop report, but now there is a 2nd and it is a 30 -- perhaps that is the card under discussion. An image of mine is attached.
![]() Regarding the comment about a weak border around the image, note that mine is missing a good chunk of the frame on the right side. Perhaps things got worse as they printed the OMs (and ran out of black ink ) Maybe I better run upstairs and see if I can squint enough to make my back blue, too!
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I took a chance on this Ellam, looked to be handcut and is a possible br OM combo...their scans vs mine.
__________________
T206 gallery Last edited by atx840; 08-02-2012 at 08:19 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
A couple technical points to consider.
There are few common black pigments for printing inks, especially from the 1910 era. The common ones are carbon black and lampblack, both forms of carbon. Neither of those fades. And neither are prone to simple color changes. Iron gall ink will initially write bluish black, but the real stuff will eventually turn brownish. And it's not typically used for printing. Pens yes, printing no. India ink can also turn blue, but I've only heard of that on tattoos. And it also isn't used much in printing. Green and brown are completely different, and can be changed/bleached. The polar bear blue would have been made by mixing some blue with some black, possibly with other colors added. I can think of a few scenarios where the wrong color might get used, and if they were producing millions of cards any one of them could have happened. So it's a very interesting card for a lot of reasons. Someone proving a point? Wow, if that's it they've done it. And if that's it our hobby just got very complex. I doubt it, but I suppose it's technically possible. Steve B |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just wierd that only one has surfaced in 100 years. Maybe printed on the same sheet as the Wags and Plank. They were printed in blue ink.
. Maybe that story of printed all those fakes in the 70's is not really a story. They were printed as jokes and impossible combinations so they couldnt fool any body. They all had a good laugh back then and I wonder if they are all having a good laugh at us now?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I examined the card closely today under a lighted loupe and believe it is legit. I compared it very carefully, back and forth, with a regular black Old Mill. There is no doubt it is blue and not faded black. It also seemed apparent to me that ink laid/adhered in the same way on both the black and the blue. In other words, the way the ink looked on the cardboard, other than being a different color, looked the same on the two. Everybody that saw in in person at the National, including many of the most knowledgeable people in the hobby agreed that it looked real.
JimB |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is the ONLY original. All of the rest of the Old Mill T-206 cards in the hobby are bogus.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The rare Brown OLD MILL cards with Factory #649 overprint(s) | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-20-2010 12:53 PM |
| T206 Brown OLD MILL's....Prints vs No-Prints | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-27-2010 10:39 AM |
| T206 Old Mill and a possible odd wet sheet transfer, help?? | B O'Brien | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-13-2010 07:14 PM |
| SOLD T206 Chase Blue PSA 3 for Sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 01-31-2007 08:02 PM |
| t206 old mill RED back?????? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 09-01-2005 01:25 AM |