|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you are asking which cards are actual photographs, Zeenuts, Exhibits, Maple Crispette and others mentioned are not photographs. They're ink and printing press prints.
Some cards that are actual photographs include N172 Old Judges, Gypsy Queens, Joseph Hall Cabinets, Lone Jack, Four Base Hits, T200 and T222 Fatimas, George Burke stamps, Topps Magic Photos, 1930s Ray O Prints. There are others that don't come to mind right now. But after reading the response posts, I'm not sure what you meant by the original question. Last edited by drc; 08-12-2012 at 12:33 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The sets I am referring to are ones based off of photos as opposed to litho/drawings etc... and not necessarily actual photo cards.
__________________
Er1ck.L. ---D381 seeker http://www.flickr.com/photos/30236659@N04/sets/ Last edited by yanksfan09; 08-12-2012 at 01:16 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
To clarify I was asking for sets based off photos (Zeenut, Exhibt, etc.) as opposed to litho/drawings (T205, T206, E90, etc). I did not know that many of the issues that appear to be photos are in fact ink prints such as Zeenuts and Exhibits. I seem to learn something new every time on the boards here, so thanks for the information! Last edited by markf31; 08-12-2012 at 02:22 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
T206 were based on photos.
I believe T205 and E90-1 were as well. Only a handful of sets are obviously based on something else. E91- all of them Buchners Maybe a few others? Steve B |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Brian |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting. I've always thought they were generic images reused. I'll have to find that article.
Steve B |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Steve,
You are not alone...many collectors still believe that all of the E91's are generic. Here is the link to the article: http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...&highlight=e91 Brian |
![]() |
|
|