|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Thanks, Christopher. 
				__________________ Successful deals with: scmavl, buymycards, nicedoctor, kutcher55, aaamchenry, brianvanhorn, jburl, tonyo, benge610, highlanderfan, westwin, cardsmemro, 27Championships, et al. My needs lists: W514 strip cards W515-2 strip cards | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Last year REA auctioned off a handcut Plank and a few other "scrap" cards from a find.  REA likely assumed these were cut from two sheets(Piedmont 150 & 350) along with the Plank (at the time all Plank Piedmont 150s were handcut) http://bid.robertedwardauctions.com/...x?itemid=18490  The Lake example from the 2012 REA auction has similar markings on the back as the previous years handcut lot (Manning), same find?, same consigner? It's likely REA made a similar assumption on being handcut from a sheet. Secondly a few of the cards show signs of missing an ink layer which along with being handcut would suggest it is a printers scrap. http://www.robertedwardauctions.com/.../2012/159.html   
				__________________ T206 gallery Last edited by atx840; 09-10-2012 at 10:23 AM. | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Nice score Jantz!
		 | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			hmmm...it would seem to me that grouping a blank backed t206 with a group of hand cut(ie. trimmed) t206's would be a nice way to create value?!
		 | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			All cards were cut from sheets. I don't see the value in the cards other than the blank backed card.
		 Last edited by packs; 09-10-2012 at 12:43 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I agree...aside from color errors(missing, etc), printing hash marks, etc which may potentially lead to a determination of printers scrap...in my opinion a trimmed card is a trimmed card...no matter if it was trimmed by a pair of scissors 100 yrs ago...or yesterday. I don't see how this can be differentiated once a card is standing alone? I'm a little surprised that some of these have been sold in the past based on assumptions? Last edited by ullmandds; 09-10-2012 at 12:48 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Very cool card, congrats!
		 | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Nice !!! 
			
			Hey Jantz- Great score !!! And I may be wrong, but it almost looks like that would've been the edge of the sheet- because there is so much border and we don't see (on the back) a miscut showing evidence of the card next to it. Awesome !!! Beautiful pick up !!! Sincerely, Clayton | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Help needed at the National | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-25-2008 11:26 AM | 
| Friday night at the National in Chicago...RSVP please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 07-25-2008 12:55 AM | 
| One of the hobbies greatest mysteries...Who really runs the The National? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-13-2006 06:57 PM | 
| National Chicle/T201 Mecca Folders | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-20-2006 02:34 PM | 
| National 2002 & Forum Dinner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-23-2002 07:57 PM |