 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: The card is | |||
| real and good. |
   
|
14 | 11.20% |
| not real. |
  
|
48 | 38.40% |
| Real but altered. |
  
|
13 | 10.40% |
| I can't tell. |
  
|
50 | 40.00% |
| Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
09-24-2012, 01:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I actually can't tell for sure but was going by the sellers own admission too. I am not sure I have seen too many sellers say something is believed to be "not real" when it is. Maybe the bidders know more than the seller and this could be a diamond in the rough? Personally, I have enough things going on to chance it. I don't need any more drama right now.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com 
|
|
#3
09-24-2012, 01:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
An unscrupulous dealer can take something like this to a mall show and sell it to a sucker for thousands of dollars. That is probably who is bidding on it. Not unlike a fake Ruth ball with a bad LOA. It's a very marketable item.
|
|
#4
09-24-2012, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If i thought it was a reprint, I wouldn't sell it for $330 (current bid as of writing). I don't care what someone is willing to pay, I don't think you can ethically sell a reprint Goudey Ruth for $330.
Last edited by drc; 09-24-2012 at 01:46 PM.
|
|
#6
09-24-2012, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
09-24-2012, 03:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Missed opportunity
The first poll choice should be "real and spectacular" instead of "real and good."
|
|
#8
09-24-2012, 04:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sellers other auctions all have exactly the same description and all are graded Mint 9 by AGS.
They are a 68 Topps Ryan rookie, a 67 Topps Mantle and a 68 Topps Mantle. Does this change anyone's mind? All good or all bad 
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number
|
|
#9
09-24-2012, 05:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The borders on the front (slightly wide on the left) do NOT match up with the WST borders on the back. On '33 Goudeys, these always seem to match up perfectly with the front.
...meaning, I think this card is made from photocopies of the front and back of a real card (with WST), and the forger didn't take the time to line up the back correctly. FAKE
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
|
|
#10
09-24-2012, 05:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I voted "I can't tell" but after reading what you guys said about the bleed through not matching up with the back , and looking at that, I can clearly see what you mean.
Sincerely, Clayton
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looks like Lew Lipset's April Auction Has Some Goodies | White Borders | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-06-2011 08:24 PM |
| MEARS January 2011 Auction updates | MEARSAUCTIONS | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-29-2011 04:09 PM |
| MEARS January 2011 Auction updates | MEARSAUCTIONS | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 01-29-2011 04:06 PM |
| Poll on Auction Closings | barrysloate | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 05-02-2010 03:00 AM |
| Auction House Clarification | scgaynor | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-03-2010 12:22 AM |
Hybrid Mode
