New T205 Website with Master Checklist

I noticed there was the Matty cycle var listed but not the PB White partial quotes and no quotes, Collins mouth closed yellow elephant, graham signature variation blue and black (blue sig pied 25 only- black sig not found on pied 25), Miller B, D, or D over B print. Any reason those aren't listed? I don't think we need SCD, PSA, or SGC to tell us guys what is and isn't a variation. There are 2 more I am working on. The HLC backed Latham had a period before the A and I believe was intended to be a WA variation. The other is a new find and currently a work in progress.

[peterb69]

Originally Posted by Pup6913

I noticed there was the Matty cycle var listed but not the PB White partial quotes and no quotes, Collins mouth closed yellow elephant, graham signature variation blue and black (blue sig pied 25 only- black sig not found on pied 25), Miller B, D, or D over B print. Any reason those aren't listed? I don't think we need SCD, PSA, or SGC to tell us guys what is and isn't a variation. There are 2 more I am working on. The HLC backed Latham had a period before the A and I believe was intended to be a WA variation. The other is a new find and currently a work in progress.

Andrew, I actually started another thread just about this topic as I agree with you they should be listed. I assume that thread would become a big debate just like the others, so I didn't want to hijack this thread.

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=158953

[Ronnie73]

Originally Posted by Pup6913

I noticed there was the Matty cycle var listed but not the PB White partial quotes and no quotes, Collins mouth closed yellow elephant, graham signature variation blue and black (blue sig pied 25 only- black sig not found on pied 25), Miller B, D, or D over B print. Any reason those aren't listed? I don't think we need SCD, PSA, or SGC to tell us guys what is and isn't a variation. There are 2 more I am working on. The HLC backed Latham had a period before the A and I believe was intended to be a WA variation. The other is a new find and currently a work in progress.

I did think about listing many of those variations but at what point is a variation not worth adding to the list. I don't know if they should be added to the Master List or maybe a Master List Extention. I was just worried that I would be getting scans of cards with 5 different shades of red and expect to list them all as different variations. I am open to any suggestions anyone might have since its everyones site to use.

Ron you listed the Matty cycle 1 loss variation. It's only missing a number. No different than any other variation.

[Tcards-Please]

I do agree with Andrew that if you are going to identify variations separately on the master list, then you would need to have all of them. If you would list the Christy Mathewson once with all confirmed backs, then you would capture the 1 loss. Same thing with Wilhelm, you will capture both variations by listing all confirmed backs as both variations are found separately on one specific back (i.e. both variations aren't found on HASSAN backs). I would think at some point that if you list all possible front/back combinations, that you would capture most (not ALL) variations.

I do agree that it probably would be beneficial to add a separate section that does include the variations that are found on the same back as the corrected version, for instance for those collectors that aren't aware that the Moran Polar Bear back has both the correct back and the stray line of text.

I do think that for the most part, this would be a good site and would only help the collecting community. I also know that some of us will not disclose everything that we know (as Andrew acknowledged) either because of further research or due to not having to compete with other collectors to obtain certain cards. I'm not picking on Andrew as there are other board members that aren't going to give up everything they know, but he was the one who was honest enough to say so.

Great job Ron and I'm glad that someone took the initiative to create a site that I believe will only help promote and provide information on one of the best T sets out there.

r/
Frank

[Leon]

So far so good Ron et al.....

I don't have much in the way of T205 but will gladly share scans if they are needed. I probably have 1-2 that could be used.

Ron- my scanner does size percentage ie 100%, 125% etc...and dpi amount ie 96dpi, 200dpi, 300 dpi etc.......what do you prefer? You can see my meager T205s at luckeycards.com 3rd section down and in ACC numerical order. Let me know if there is anything you can use....and if you can just right click and copy them, that would be great too......best regards

[jimivintage]

Someone is selling a Broadleaf Lewis Richie on eBay right now. You can check the picture out in his listing. Sorry, but I'm having troubles with pics right now.

I will be posting my collection tomorrow. Use what you want for the list.

[Ronnie73]

Originally Posted by Pup6913

I will be posting my collection tomorrow. Use what you want for the list.

Thank you Andrew, I look forward to it. Thank you everyone else also. I will be updating the checklist Sunday night.

Ron

[HOF Auto Rookies]

Ron,

Love the thought of the site and hope all goes well. I know it's in it's primitive stages, but maybe you can have a list for the toughest backs in order and possibly a list of th toughest known combinations of front and backs.

Keep up the good work!