 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-05-2012, 09:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I agree that the 1986 set sucked. I have always hated that set and not just for the fact that it's worthless, but just because the design was terrible. As a kid I couldn't wait for the 1987 set to come out so I woudn't be picking up the 86s anymore.
As far the 70's sets, I like all of them. Thanks, AndyH
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here 
|
|
#3
12-05-2012, 02:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
'86 did stink, and heavily, although I was focusing my thinking on 52-79. I always thought the '73 action shots were okay, and the white borders with the little silhouette, IMO, are much better than some of the others.
|
|
#4
12-05-2012, 04:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Minority opinion
Wow. Guess I'm the minority opinion here. I actually like 1973 the BEST of any set in the 1970s. The 1973 Aaron card inparticular is a favorite of mine. That was the set that made me decide to start collecting actually.
My worst set would be that ugly monstrosity .... 1972. Cheers, Patrick
|
|
#7
12-06-2012, 09:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I considered 1975
Howard - I considered 1975 too, but at least I liked the look of the All Star cards in that year. Can't think of one single card in the 1972 set that I like the look of. (Okay now that I say it - I do like the Clemente card - but that's the only one. So for me that gives 1975 an edge over 1972.)
Cheers, Patrick
|
|
#8
12-06-2012, 02:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
50's none
60's 1968 70's tie 1972 and 1975 80's 1987 (bad attempt of 62 remake) 90's 1990 Drew
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
