 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
12-07-2012, 09:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I believe M101-5 is slightly earlier than M101-4. You can tell the difference between the sets because some players are slightly different in each set. However, for Ruth, there is no way to tell the difference because they look exactly the same in each set. The TPG's pretty much put M101-4 or M101-5 on the card arbitrarily, I believe, for Ruth. Therefore, for Ruth, the values for M101-4 and M101-5 are equal. (I think there are som back combinations that are only in one set and not the other, I believe.)
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about 1916 M101-4 Sporting News Joe Jackson | cobblove | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-09-2010 07:55 AM |
| Question re: Ruth M101-4/M101-5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-08-2007 07:08 PM |
| Question about 1916 M101-4 issue | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 03-14-2006 01:05 PM |
| Looking for 1916 M101-4 Sporting News Babe Ruth | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 01-17-2006 09:27 AM |
Threaded Mode