|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am no expert in this field, so I won't pretend to be. I am just wondering, Lelands rejected it because they thought it was an inkjet copy - that is where the skeptism is coming from. Troy did everything within reason to disprove that. Yes, there is always some obscure, outside chance that this card (or any for that matter) is a counterfeit, but hasn't he done enough? I trust SGC over Lelands and I certainly trust the expertise of SGC and Messier over any auction house. Enough is enough. I think it's time to put the pitchforks down and enjoy the auction. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just have one more question and it's for in general. Say any high priced item is sold and then in acouple months determined it was stolen years ago. So I'd guess the FBI or whoever would take the item back and return to where it was stolen from. So would the buyer get their money back? Then say the seller who didn't know it was stolen spent the money? So what would happen.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Troy,
Given the potential value of this card, the additional cost of testing the paper would not seem prohibitive. This testing would allay doubts about the age of the CdV. The pool of prospective serious bidders for this CdV is small. Excluding any from this group could have a detrimental effect on the final price. If I were the seller, I would not hesitate to bear the expense of reducing existing doubts about the CdV with further testing. Although I agree that you have gone above and beyond what would be normally considered sufficient authentication for this type of item, doubts are in the minds of many in your serious bidding pool for various reasons. Why not remove these doubts? Last edited by GaryPassamonte; 01-10-2013 at 10:02 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
One thing I will tell you all and then I am going to stop posting on this site is, this card is not stolen and this card is not a fake. From here you all will have to determine the fate and legacy of this card. We have done out job authenticating it and promoting it. The question now is do you want to own a rare piece of baseball history, or do you not? Troy |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does anyone here have a scan of some high quality 19th century albumen forgeries? I've been blissfully ignorant about this stuff and have always assumed stuff that looked real was real.
I guess if this CDV could be fake there could be plenty of fake OJs out there. At the very least, I doubt this CDV was a first attempt, if it is indeed fake. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Troy--will is auction have a reserve?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay This is a no reserve absolute auction.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Surely your 100k bid will cover the reserve Jay.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I commend you Troy, for coming on the board and trying to do what you thought was right to put everyone's fears to rest. I know you must be a bit frustrated at this point, as you did have SGC give it their stamp of approval, and then sent it to Messier to clear up the laser/inkjet speculation. I am no one to give any opinion on the item, as I only know what I've learned in this thread, but I myself was under the impression that the remainding issue was with the laser/inkjet thing, and that you did your best to clear this up by sending it to Messier for his opinion, upon the advice of board members.
Please understand that (in my opinion) no one is questioning your ethics, and any speculation about the item is normal amongst collectors. I am the same way about the type of cards I collect. The collectors who collect these types of items spend large amounts of money on them, and just want to be sure beyond a reasonable doubt. Please don't take any of it personal. I hope interested parties take you up on your offer to come down and check it out for themselves. This may quell their speculation, and give them the confidence to bid on what appears to be a beautiful CDV. Good luck in your auction !! Sincerely, Clayton |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Compare that to the improbability of the find as described.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mark- I am not sure he understands how GREAT some of the fraudsters are at their trade. Several in this thread do.
As for the photo, I am not an expert but hope the pitchforks stay out, only in the name of safety. The CDV very well could be perfect with a clean pedigree, I will let others argue that.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 SGC Graded Brooklyn Team Set 23 out of 27 Cards SOLD SOLD!!! | brookdodger55 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 03-31-2012 06:15 PM |
| Looking for Brooklyn Dodger Collectors | dougscats | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-27-2010 05:19 PM |
| Looking for Brooklyn Dodgers collectors | dougscats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-24-2010 12:16 PM |
| FS: RARE Ca. 1860's CDV Civil War Generals and Officers featuring Abner Doubleday SGC Auth | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-06-2008 07:07 PM |
| Early Baseball CDV | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 07-25-2004 11:24 PM |