Brooklyn CDV

[oldjudge]

Mark-could this also mean that this is a photograph of the LOC photograph and the camera was not aligned perfectly?

[bmarlowe1]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Mark-could this also mean that this is a photograph of the LOC photograph and the camera was not aligned perfectly?

I don't think so - I don't see how that could cause what we are seeing. Being that not one of these guys appears to have budged, a stereo pair seems like a good explanation. That would mean that the Saco photo is from a different negative than the LoC photo.

Shawn - I remember that also - but in that one someone had clearly moved.

I do have some glasses for viewing stereo images that works with images on a computer screen. I won't be able to try that until tonight. The LoC photo goes on the left. There is probably a bit of spatial distortion in the scans we have, so even if these are a stereo pair, the 3-D effect may not be too good.

[smokelessjoe]

Ahhhh.... I remember the Chicago photo now... I think I am thinking of another one though... Yale or Harvard?

I am curious about the mans foot - the foot to the farthest right of the photo... Is it moving or is that just an angle deal?

[bmarlowe1]

Originally Posted by smokelessjoe

Ahhhh.... I remember the Chicago photo now... I think I am thinking of another one though... Yale or Harvard?

I am curious about the mans foot - the foot to the farthest right of the photo... Is it moving or is that just an angle deal?

I think it is angle. If we could see the carpet pattern in the Saco photo better, it would probably appear to be moving a bit.

[smokelessjoe]

Gotcha, thank you Mark