|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not to spoil the party but....if there are at least two players ahead of you after today's games, and each picks a different team to win the Superbowl, everyone below them is officially eliminated. Sad but true.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeppers. I picked what I thought was the oddball matchup, that would give me the best chance to make a move. Suddenly the Harbaugh bowl seems like the hot pick. And I think I'm pretty much out of running no matter what at this point..
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sunday Night Standings
16 T206BrownHindu 14 D. Broughman 14 nolemmings 14 AndyG09 14 boysblue 14 Big Ben 14 bigred1 13 novakir 13 RGold 13 Bill Stone 12 irishdenny 11 ChiSoxFan 11 talkinbaseball 11 glchen 11 RicksRookies 10 frankbmd 10 pgellis 10 Wahoowa 10 SushiX37 10 pariah1107 10 jcmtiger 10 ChrisH 10 peterose4hof 10 rickybulldog50 10 freakhappy 10 Buythatcard 9 Jason 9 x2drich2000 9 Paul S 8 cardboardbliss 8 Jlighter 8 barrysloate 8 wolf441 8 familytoad 8 EvilKing00 8 old13man 8 gashousegang 7 Runscott 7 veloce 7 iwantitiwinit 7 pawpawdiv9 7 Pat R 6 drmondobueno 6 AndrewJerome 6 mybuddyinc 6 BleedinBlue 5 GoldenAge50s 5 jimivintage 4 cobb1969 3 itjclarke 3 tiger8mush 3 esd10 2 chris6net 2 Mikehealer 2 Danny Smith 2 perezfan 2 shelly 2 oldjudge 2 t206hound 2 npa589 0 Eric72 Safe to assume that at least one of the 14s, if not all, will differ from T206BrownHindu, our leader with 16, in their final game pick, therefore only if you have fourteen points now are you requested to enter the tie breaker and predict the total points scored in the Super Bowl.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dr. Monster Number,
I will take the opposite of T206BrownHindu and my total points is 42. San Francisco. Best, Andy Last edited by AndyG09; 01-20-2013 at 09:03 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I won't make people wait on my pick, it will be the...
Baltimore Ravens I didn't wager one dime this postseason...and I end up going 9-1 so far and would have probably won all of them against the spread, too! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
With 2 different picks with people ahead of me, I'm already out now, so F*** it, I'm going for 2nd place. So I'll follow you. My pick is Baltimore. Even though I'm at 13, and points won't mean anything, I'll be a rebel and throw some points out anyway. 47
Last edited by novakjr; 01-20-2013 at 09:58 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
49ers
48 points |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
49ers - 37 total pts. Actual score 49ers 31 ravens 6 book it
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
San Francisco 40 pts
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Might as well keep playing.........
San Francisco - 44 Pts. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3rd Annual Boston Net54 Lunch | wolterse | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 08-09-2012 09:22 PM |
| Anybody in on an NFL Playoff Pool? | barrysloate | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 6 | 01-02-2012 05:59 PM |
| 5th Annual Net54 Dinner logistics update | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-02-2007 11:54 PM |
| 5th Annual Net54 National Dinner - RSVP | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 07-24-2007 10:45 PM |
| 2nd Annual Net54 NCAA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 04-06-2004 11:28 AM |