![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While the other two aren't necessarily impressive cards by any means, I think the grades look somewhat fair. The Ruth appears to have two bad surface spots.. I can't tell if it's paperloss, inkloss or just bad scrapes/scratches..
Still looks like a great card though.. Last edited by novakjr; 02-13-2013 at 01:08 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those scrapes or whatever they are are why the grade is low. It's a really great looking 35, and should bring more than a typical one.
The common that's a 50 seems like a really weak 50 to me. That happens sometimes. The scan of the 40 is just too small to really tell much. Steve B |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
KSA Grading | bradmar48 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 08-15-2011 12:20 AM |