So why do the Doyle and Magie errors counts as part of the set?

rainier2004 · #1 03-05-2013, 09:23 AM

Thanks for the answers gang. By all means, to each their own. Im collecting my Frankenstein CJ set - Currently at 159 1915s, 19 1914 including the Bres no # going for my monster number of 180. I could care less what anyone else thinks should or should not be in my set and its never even dawned on me to ask for anothers opinion as its irrelevant. Is this the point of t206? Are you guys the rebel of the set collecting world? Did I just make a connection to you crazy people? I get it, maybe my bigger issue is I have never thought of a way that feels comfortable for me to do t206s...Wagner really puts a kink in my set collector self....

travrosty · #2 03-05-2013, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainier2004

Thanks for the answers gang. By all means, to each their own. Im collecting my Frankenstein CJ set - Currently at 159 1915s, 19 1914 including the Bres no # going for my monster number of 180. I could care less what anyone else thinks should or should not be in my set and its never even dawned on me to ask for anothers opinion as its irrelevant. Is this the point of t206? Are you guys the rebel of the set collecting world? Did I just make a connection to you crazy people? I get it, maybe my bigger issue is I have never thought of a way that feels comfortable for me to do t206s...Wagner really puts a kink in my set collector self....

just get a nice reprint or skip the wagner, anyone collecting autographs of heavyweight boxing champions have to skip the marvin hart, because there arent any around. so the set is considered complete without the hart autograph.

Runscott · #3 03-05-2013, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travrosty

just get a nice reprint or skip the wagner, anyone collecting autographs of heavyweight boxing champions have to skip the marvin hart, because there arent any around. so the set is considered complete without the hart autograph.

I hate to admit it, but I bought a nice Wagner reprint about 8 years ago, knowing I would never own the real thing. Still, it is part of the set.

Sean · #4 03-05-2013, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Runscott

I hate to admit it, but I bought a nice Wagner reprint about 8 years ago, knowing I would never own the real thing. Still, it is part of the set.

I did the same thing. I bought a reprint of Wagner, and later got it autographed by Wayne Gretzky. I always get a laugh from people to whom I show it.

Runscott · #5 03-05-2013, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean

I did the same thing. I bought a reprint of Wagner, and later got it autographed by Wayne Gretzky. I always get a laugh from people to whom I show it.

Cobb & Edwards signed mine.

^
|______ Huge 'just kidding'

Sean · #6 03-05-2013, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainier2004

Thanks for the answers gang. By all means, to each their own. Im collecting my Frankenstein CJ set - Currently at 159 1915s, 19 1914 including the Bres no # going for my monster number of 180. I could care less what anyone else thinks should or should not be in my set and its never even dawned on me to ask for anothers opinion as its irrelevant. Is this the point of t206? Are you guys the rebel of the set collecting world? Did I just make a connection to you crazy people? I get it, maybe my bigger issue is I have never thought of a way that feels comfortable for me to do t206s...Wagner really puts a kink in my set collector self....

I don't know much about Cracker Jacks. Do you have the 1914 Mathewson and Del Pratt cards?

rainier2004 · #7 03-05-2013, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean

I don't know much about Cracker Jacks. Do you have the 1914 Mathewson and Del Pratt cards?

Thats a negative...I have the 1915 CJs of both. The 1914 CJ Matty may be the most expensive card that I hold out hopes of ever owning as I think its truly an iconic card. The Pratt doesnt do anything for me...there are other 1914s just as rare without all the pub. This is awesome, CJs getting into my first and only t206 thread!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Sweet Cap (Fac. 30) set-No Wagner, Magie, Doyle & St Lo vars.	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	35	01-10-2013 02:37 PM
Looking for double names, miscuts, printing errors, proofs, ghost, errors	Archive	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	4	08-19-2008 04:03 PM
Survey: How many T206 Magie errors??	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	14	05-29-2007 04:44 PM
"PIEDMONT 1st" Theory - Magie, Doyle Errors, etc.	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	13	06-30-2006 09:48 AM
The Magie - Doyle Error vs Variation Caper	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	7	12-15-2003 03:44 AM