T206 BURNS (corrected glove variation)

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by z28jd

It's possible the pic wasn't that clear when looking at the glove. It was a dark object on a black and white photo, who knows how visible it was in the pic. Until you find the original photo, I'm going with artist error

To me, it's a stretch to assume that because he's wearing the wrong glove, that the original photo must have had an indistinguishable blob where his glove would have been, but okay.

[z28jd]

Originally Posted by Runscott

To me, it's a stretch to assume that because he's wearing the wrong glove, that the original photo must have had an indistinguishable blob where his glove would have been, but okay.

That was just going off what you said, that a pre-1909 black and white outdoor picture would clearly show detail on a glove. Not hard to believe that it might not

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by z28jd

That was just going off what you said, that a pre-1909 black and white outdoor picture would clearly show detail on a glove. Not hard to believe that it might not

I get it

I get it

I get it





I disagree