![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Been known for several years.
George Vrechek told me at least 2 years ago. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I stand corrected
![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I give you full credit for the " re"discovery !!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I give you full credit David, since George did not tell me about it,
![]() But I will admit George is a great resource on variations, errors and oddities. I would put this in the print defect grouping. I have a couple other 52 border irregularities like this one and there is a discussion of 52 variations in general in a recent thread in here |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help! Newly discovered multisport set! | Cardboard Junkie | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 05-20-2011 02:49 PM |