![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is that a reference to what I posted? I am sure that isn't an altered case, that came from the PSA website.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok, just wondering, nice thats its a 10. I never looked at the PSA site for buying.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I would definitely grade the Namath. I think it's in the five range (give or take a grade) if it does not have any creases or indentions and such. This is my opinion based on your pic.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 1965 Topps Joe Namath RC #122 (Low-Mid Grade) | freakhappy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-03-2011 11:28 PM |
1965 " Namath" Card | Ben Yourg | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-16-2009 08:59 PM |