Let's see some impossible back miscuts

[sb1]

Here is one you won't see often


And... I think it needs to be addressed as to the two types of errors shown in this thread.

Miscuts would be where the card is centered front and back correctly and then miscut markedly incorrect, the two posted by Blunder illustrate this very tough error.

When the front is centered properly and the back is off center(such as the card I am posting), this would be a misalignment of the sheet prior to printing the backs. As would be the upside down ones, etc. Not Miscut.

[z28jd]

It's free-thinking like this that will get you burned at the stake! I call heresy!

Just when did you start to feel this way Scott, maybe we can pinpoint the brainwashing and try to win you back. I'm saying sometime after Winter 2010....

http://www.b-lauctions.com/LotDetail...ventoryid=1181

Originally Posted by sb1

And... I think it needs to be addressed as to the two types of errors shown in this thread.

Miscuts would be where the card is centered front and back correctly and then miscut markedly incorrect, the two posted by Blunder illustrate this very tough error.

When the front is centered properly and the back is off center(such as the card I am posting), this would be a misalignment of the sheet prior to printing the backs. As would be the upside down ones, etc. Not Miscut.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by z28jd

It's free-thinking like this that will get you burned at the stake! I call heresy!

Just when did you start to feel this way Scott, maybe we can pinpoint the brainwashing and try to win you back. I'm saying sometime after Winter 2010....

http://www.b-lauctions.com/LotDetail...ventoryid=1181

I honestly don't remember that card but both Scott and I write descriptions. It could have been me.

[z28jd]

Originally Posted by Leon

I honestly don't remember that card but both Scott and I write descriptions. It could have been me.

How did you let him go astray, Leon?

This is why t206's of every small "error" are called freaks now, because people were getting to worked up over the word error being used so freely.

We all know what miscuts mean when dealing with the cards, no need to try to change it now is all I'm saying

[atx840]

Shown many many times but requested again

[Abravefan11]

Here's a couple of non-sport split backs. The T80 Old Mill Jimmy showed in a group earlier, and an upside down split back Tolstoi T79.





Johnny it's not as nice as yours, but this Herzog has second back showing.

[sb1]

Originally Posted by z28jd

It's free-thinking like this that will get you burned at the stake! I call heresy!

Just when did you start to feel this way Scott, maybe we can pinpoint the brainwashing and try to win you back. I'm saying sometime after Winter 2010....

http://www.b-lauctions.com/LotDetail...ventoryid=1181

Hard to say, but I probably did do that lot description, an error on my part, but most certainly I was caught up in the T206 fever at the time!

[sb1]

I wonder if James Maxwell feels any exhuberance in the plethora of micro T206 dash, dots, shadows and maladies of todays T206's. He was a man before his time.

And for you T206 collectors not familiar with him, Do your homework!

[ullmandds]

I was thinking about James Maxwell just yesterday...wishing I still had some of their auction mailings...a seemingly endless flood of t206's...proofs...rare backs...top grade...you name it!!!!!!

[t213]

I owned that E90-2 Clarke Leon posted back in the mid-90s, it's like seeing an old friend again!

Andy

[Marslife]

IMG_0023.jpg

IMG_0024.jpg

[1880nonsports]

Originally Posted by sb1

I wonder if James Maxwell feels any exhuberance in the plethora of micro T206 dash, dots, shadows and maladies of todays T206's. He was a man before his time.

And for you T206 collectors not familiar with him, Do your homework!

SB1 - Scott I'm pretty sure James Maxwell and Virginia Caputo(?) are still alive and well. Occasionally I see something that THEY list on Feebay. Interesting people and EVERY card JM had for sale was A VARIATION/ERROR.....

[bn2cardz]

Going through my collection recently and thought that this card fit the criteria for this thread "Impossible back miscuts"

Considering that the back isn't just miscut, but it is a back from another set and upside down:

Menagerie Lobert E92 (mislabeled as e102)

[mrvster]

Now that's a beauty