New '52 Mantle Forgery...This one is clever

[savedfrommyspokes]

I printed out an image of this card(as I have done with other cards that are suspect) and attempted to scan the barcode, and the barcode would NOT scan on this card. I have many others cards I have done this with and have scanned. While the cert number is able to be looked up and verified in the system, the barcode should be able to be scanned and match the cert number on the right of the card. Not all fakes, but on a good number of them(the bad fakes especially), the barcode either does not scan at all or does not match the cert number when scanned.

[the 'stache]

Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes

I printed out an image of this card(as I have done with other cards that are suspect) and attempted to scan the barcode, and the barcode would NOT scan on this card. I have many others cards I have done this with and have scanned. While the cert number is able to be looked up and verified in the system, the barcode should be able to be scanned and match the cert number on the right of the card. Not all fakes, but on a good number of them(the bad fakes especially), the barcode either does not scan at all or does not match the cert number when scanned.

saved, that's actually quite fascinating. And I wonder if that's not one of the ways that collectors like you and I could be protected when buying a graded card.

We look at the barcodes, and see a series of black lines. Well, I wonder if there isn't a way to increase the complexity of the barcodes so they would appear normal to the naked eye, yet would somehow immediately disqualify fakes when scanned. PSA could make available some type of scanner for purchase to their clientele so when your purchased card arrives from some third party, you can scan it, and verify it's authenticity.

The idea would be analogous to writing on a grain of rice. An incredible amount of information can be stored in a very tiny place. Who says that same methodology couldn't be used on a flip. It would require a fairly high level of sophistication, something that your average thief wouldn't know how to replicate.

[RobertGT]

I'm not so sure an unsuspecting bidder hasn't been scammed out of big bucks in this auction.

This auction wasn't yanked by eBay, rather it was shut down by the seller with the explanation that "the item is no longer available." That could mean two things:

1) The sellers has a conscience and removed the auction after being informed it was a fake or:

2) Seller has a deal to sell the card off eBay. In my experience, when auctions are shut down early, it's usually because the seller has struck a deal with a bidder to do the deal off ebay and avoid ebay's horrendous fees for a high-dollar item. This would mean the worst case scenario for the bidder because he will not be protected by a misrepresentation claim.

I would be curious to hear what the seller's explanation is for why this card was yanked from ebay. Also, should watch him to see if the card pops up on his site in a month or two.

[savedfrommyspokes]

Originally Posted by the 'stache

saved, that's actually quite fascinating. And I wonder if that's not one of the ways that collectors like you and I could be protected when buying a graded card.

We look at the barcodes, and see a series of black lines. Well, I wonder if there isn't a way to increase the complexity of the barcodes so they would appear normal to the naked eye, yet would somehow immediately disqualify fakes when scanned. PSA could make available some type of scanner for purchase to their clientele so when your purchased card arrives from some third party, you can scan it, and verify it's authenticity.

The idea would be analogous to writing on a grain of rice. An incredible amount of information can be stored in a very tiny place. Who says that same methodology couldn't be used on a flip. It would require a fairly high level of sophistication, something that your average thief wouldn't know how to replicate.

Bill, not sure if you have seen this link or not, but I keep it in mind when looking over these types of cards. Yes, one would think there should be better technology than a simple barcode to help verify authenticity.

http://bbcemporium.com/california-craigs-list-psa-scam/

[Bestdj777]

Although scanning the bar code may work on some, I have heard of some people using legitimate PSA labels/holders but replacing them with fake cards. Several weeks ago, someone was actually selling the holder and label for a cracked 52 Mantle on eBay. At the time, I think it was bringing decent money as well.

[Brianruns10]

Originally Posted by Bestdj777

Although scanning the bar code may work on some, I have heard of some people using legitimate PSA labels/holders but replacing them with fake cards. Several weeks ago, someone was actually selling the holder and label for a cracked 52 Mantle on eBay. At the time, I think it was bringing decent money as well.

Which is PRECISELY why you can't go by any diagnostics relating to the PSA holder. Because everything can be forged properly.

But forging the card is far, far more difficult if you know what to look for, such as what I've pointed out. We all need to educate ourselves on these forgeries, which I suspect are coming from the same small group of people, as they all have the same false aging, the same diagnostics for fakery.

[sportscollector]

that is the worst fake mantle and worst by far fake PSA lable I ever saw. its so bad even ray Charles or stevie wonder should be able to tell it's fake.

[Brianruns10]

Originally Posted by sportscollector

that is the worst fake mantle and worst by far fake PSA lable I ever saw. its so bad even ray Charles or stevie wonder should be able to tell it's fake.

Can't argue with you there. To the educated eye, there should be no mistaking a real from a forgery. You simply can replicate the printing methods they used in '52 via modern processes. It's just not the same.

Sadly some don't educate themselves. They just buy the plastic. They haven't bothered to gain wisdom into the hobby. They just buy these cards like commodities, to diversify their investment portfolios, to later be sold for a 10 percent return.

They are fools from whom they deserve to be parted from their money. The only reason I personally don't let these suckers lose their money, is these forgeries harm the hobby as a whole, and scare away new participants, which we desperately need. There aren't enough young people like me getting involved, and there needs to be more.