|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which is it? Manipulating scans to "to ensure the images we provide are as close to life-like as humanly possible." or "the shear workload associated with having to manipulate scans would be stagg(er)ing."?
Intentional or not, the scans are hot. They sure don't look like factory default settings. And if someones job is ensuring "the images we provide are as close to life-like as humanly possible.", they aren't manipulating them properly.
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jim, you forget to mention the moral issues attendant to such manipulations.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmm .... which scan probably looks more like the card?
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Morality tells me the one on the left.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bill Mastro's priest says the one on the left too.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
![]() |
|
|