|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What was the buyer's response to your question? Last edited by auggiedoggy; 04-29-2013 at 03:34 PM. Reason: Never get it right the first time |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
clearly on the buyer here..... not sure why he would even come back?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
On the buyer here. Auction clearly states the card is trimmed. He would have never gotten a numeric grade. Why didn't he get it slabbed as 'AUTHENTIC'?? I would not offer a refund. Did you ask him why he though a $400 card sold for only $30?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
on a side note...larry...why do you show a t206 green cobb in the middle of the listing...this can only serve to confuse in my opinion?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
A buyer would send a trimmed card to a TPG to have it authenticated, and slabbed as such. But why has the buyer come to you for postage and submission fee? I also am curious about the pic of the cobb in the middle of your listing. Dave
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
That was my second impression.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with everyone above, it's on the buyer.
To avoid this issue in the future, I suggest adding the word "trimmed" to the listing title, there was plenty of room to do so. I understand that it is in red lettering, but when half of your listing description is in red, it makes it a bit harder to notice. I also suggest removing that Cobb green portrait from the listing, it further adds to the confusion. Hopefully you don't get a neg, and hopefully you will tweak these little particulars before you get another unsatisfied buyer. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
The buyer is 100% at fault here, but you're in a tough spot Larry. Sounds like he is unreasonable enough to hit you with an undeserved negative if you don't meet his ridiculous terms.
If it were me I would try to reason with him again, but wouldn't cave on the grading fees one bit. If he ended up leaving me a negative, I would respond with something like "Description clearly stated that the card was trimmed. Please read the entire description" I think future buyers will read that response, and be able to see that the buyer was being unreasonable. Plus I don't think anyone will make a big deal over one stray negative with your overall strong feedback rating. Good luck whatever you decide to do! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
If it were me, I would offer a refund plus postage both ways. I'm very protective of my feedback.
I try to put descriptors in my listings for material information, and think best practice is to note something like "trimmed" in the title. I think it is even more important to do so now that mobile bidding is so common and a lot of people don't closely read descriptions and/or they don't always render well on a mobile device. I believe there is a good chance the potential buyer clicked on the photo, saw what looked like a nice T206 and bid based on the photo and auction title alone. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
You could inform the buyer that you always have the ability to tell this story on this and the PSA boards, post his user id and suggest people might consider blocking him as a bidder. And people would block him, because many sellers have zero interest in dealing with this kind of bidder. He may think twice about proceeding with unreasonable demands. If they are indeed unreasonable (*not taking sides).
Last edited by drc; 04-30-2013 at 01:34 AM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just advertising that's all
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you all for your opinions!
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the buyer did his homework he wouldn't have to worry about flunking the test.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe he was pissed off at the sp of the word 'Cheif'(sic)?
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/themessage94/ Always up for a trade. If you have a Blue Weiser Wonder WaJo, PM/Email Me! |
![]() |
|
|