HA: Babe Ruth 1933 Goudey PSA/DNA

HOF Auto Rookies · #1 04-30-2013, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lordstan

I am an autograph guy. I think everyone makes some good points, but I think some are overthinking it to a degree. I agree the overall eye appeal of the yellow card is superior, but I can't see eye appeal alone result in the 3x price difference between the yellow card and the others.

The 1933 Goudey set is collected by a large number of people. A group of those specialize in the signed set. I think the likelihood is that 2 or more people who are collecting the signed set are going head to head on this card. I've seen other signed Ruth's but not that one.

Just my 2c.
Mark

I know at least 4 other people who are most likely in a bidding war. There are plenty of signed Goudey Ruth's surprisingly

milkit1 · #2 04-30-2013, 10:29 AM

I'm not one of them. I'm happy with my one signed ruth. I'm currently at 180 different signed 33s but I will be surprised if I can secure anymore.

yanksfan09 · #3 04-30-2013, 11:26 AM

fwiw, and that's probably not much, I'm skeptical of all those Ruth sigs. The yellow one looks okay, more or less, but the other ones look funny to me. I'm not saying they're not real and maybe those are styles I'm not familiar with but I wouldn't feel comfortable with them.

I really don't like the R in the middle one and the far right one, the B and TH is funny to me.

Steve D · #4 05-01-2013, 02:36 PM

Hauls of Shame has joined the fray on these cards:

http://haulsofshame.com/blog/?p=19877#more-19877

Steve

glchen · #5 05-01-2013, 02:59 PM

BTW, REA also has a signed 1933 Goudey #144 Ruth, which is currently smoking HA's similar Ruth. Link. (None of these are my consignments.)

wonkaticket · #6 05-01-2013, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve D

Hauls of Shame has joined the fray on these cards:

http://haulsofshame.com/blog/?p=19877#more-19877

Steve

More great work from Pete Nash. I'm still waiting for Pete to put out his article on all the fake items he made and put in folks collections.

Peter if you're reading this when can we expect that article go up on the website? It would be a great read Pete. Only if you have the time you know between dragging dead collectors names thru the mud to draw attention away from your ongoing legal issues and such.

Keep us posted.

Vintageclout · #7 05-01-2013, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

More great work from Pete Nash. I'm still waiting for Pete to put out his article on all the fake items he made and put in folks collections.

Peter if you're reading this when can we expect that article go up on the website? It would be a great read Pete. Only if you have the time you know between dragging dead collectors names thru the mud to draw attention away from your ongoing legal issues and such.

Keep us posted.

+1 - I Couldn't have said it better John!

Joe T.

HOF Auto Rookies · #8 05-02-2013, 09:25 AM

Wow, up to $35k...

sylbry · #9 05-02-2013, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

More great work from Pete Nash. I'm still waiting for Pete to put out his article on all the fake items he made and put in folks collections.

Peter if you're reading this when can we expect that article go up on the website? It would be a great read Pete. Only if you have the time you know between dragging dead collectors names thru the mud to draw attention away from your ongoing legal issues and such.

Keep us posted.

That dead collector deserves to have his name drug through the mud.

Peter is the Jose Canseco of baseball memorabilia. He was "deeply involved" in the beginning, has a lot of critics, and there is a lot of truth in what he now says.

glchen · #10 05-02-2013, 03:35 PM

Great collection, Sean!

wonkaticket · #11 05-02-2013, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sylbry

That dead collector deserves to have his name drug through the mud.

Peter is the Jose Canseco of baseball memorabilia. He was "deeply involved" in the beginning, has a lot of critics, and there is a lot of truth in what he now says.

Peter is a man who has been accused of being a crook and a scam artist. He has a slew of legal problems to boot. He�s no white knight or shining star to change the hobby for the better. If Peter wants to clean up the hobby that�s great here�s an idea. How about pointing out all the bad items he�s allegedly responsible for and making those who have bought bad items connected to Nash whole by coming clean.

Nah it�s easier to sit in cyberspace hide from your legal problems. Drag hobby icons who are dead and can�t defend themselves thru the mud. All while putting up smoke screens to draw attention away from the 800lb gorilla in the room which is your own very public fraudulent activities all while taking the fifth along the way.

Taking advice from Peter on fraud is like Jerry Sandusky managing the �Megan�s Law� lists for the authorities.

Matthew H · #12 05-02-2013, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sylbry

That dead collector deserves to have his name drug through the mud.

Peter is the Jose Canseco of baseball memorabilia. He was "deeply involved" in the beginning, has a lot of critics, and there is a lot of truth in what he now says.

So do you agree with Nash that all four signed '33 Goudey Ruths offered in HA and REA are "poorly executed forgeries"?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FS: 1928 Harrington's Babe Ruth and 1933 Goudey Ruth #149	piecesofthegame	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	1	01-04-2013 06:50 AM
1933 Goudey #53 Babe Ruth vs 1934 "Canadian Goudey" WWG #28 Babe Ruth	Yaz#8	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	18	02-21-2012 09:31 AM
1933 Goudey Babe Ruth #181 SGC 50	Archive	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	02-06-2008 06:51 PM
WTB: 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth	Archive	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	07-29-2007 10:40 PM
WTB: 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth	Archive	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	07-29-2007 10:39 PM