1927 Yankees baseball. Opinions, please.

[packs]

I'm glad you mentioned the gallery at Yankee Stadium. Are those balls real? Every single one looked fake to me, even the Don Mattingly.

I should clarify. Fake as in manufactured, not signed by someone else.

[Sean1125]

It almost looks like a stamped ball to me?? I will wait to see what OP says!

[ATP]

It isn't stamped, I can see the ink lines from some of the overlaps. Does Lou have an extra letter in his first name???

[David Atkatz]

No, it certainly isn't stamped.

[GoldenAge50s]

The whole thing looks bogus & contrived to me.

[dapro]

This ball looks too clean to me.

[MVSNYC]

I'm certainly no expert, but i have owned a few Ruth signed checks in the past, so i guess i can comment. the Ruth sig actually looks fine to me, it's the Lou that looks off- maybe club house?

[David Atkatz]

The only clubhouse Gehrigs known appear on late thirties team balls--almost always 1939--and look nothing like a genuine Gehrig.

[BigJJ]

D, tough call. I wouldn't buy it, but thats not the question you present. Off hand don't like the single quote marks, the lead into the "e" in Babe and the cross of the "t" in Ruth. I also don't like the long Louuuuu. Odd because some of the flow feels right doesn't it. Tough one. And Ruth did make the "R" error with regularity and the under flow of the "R" though off in location, the flow is on. Do we receive a clear answer? This feels like a test.

[David Atkatz]

No test. I have nothing to reveal.
I don't know--not sure myself. Really just want to see how others feel.