Hunt Auction Pickups

MVSNYC · #1 05-30-2013, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Collector

This is an interesting card, no doubt. But my rule of thumb on these printing "errors" is that if it happened in another set -- say 1930s Goudey or 1950s Topps -- would anyone care?

If the answer is "no", then why does the fact that it happened in T206 matter?

T206Collector- your philosophy doesn't hold water at all, IMO. you can't compare T206 to other sets. same question back at ya, can you compare signed T206's to signed 1950's Topps? no way. T206 is a special animal...you should know this.

packs · #2 05-30-2013, 08:04 PM

I would pay $45 for that card.

Matthew H · #3 05-30-2013, 08:34 PM

I could be wrong, but it seems like most of the 206 freaks that come up for auction, end up in the pick-up thread. All rare cards have a thin market. What's interesting to me is that most of the market for these freaks seem to be board members that aren't particularly private with what they are buying. They all seem to be friends, and I'm sure they bid each other up! The freaks are an interesting anomaly, and the group of collectors after them are interesting too!

perezfan · #4 05-30-2013, 08:43 PM

I don't personally see it, but maybe these printing error cards are just beginning to reach their potential (in terms of dollar value).

Such "freaks" are even more coveted in stamp and coin collecting, with a far greater premium paid for most examples. Here's one of the more famous ones...

http://scoop.diamondgalleries.com/Ho...rticleID=50832

Perhaps Baseball Error Cards are finally starting build some steam and catch up? I believe that these anomalies will become more valuable/desirable with each year that passes (and may not always be so thinly traded).

Matthew H · #5 05-30-2013, 08:44 PM

Good point.

ullmandds · #6 05-30-2013, 08:47 PM

I guess it's just part of the evolution of the hobby?! I mean why are collectibles...collectible? Because most were discarded...played with...used and abused?! These freaks and miscues should have been thrown away...but weren't...so while this stuff was viewed in the past as the garbage it was intended to be...it survived...so now it is very collectible.

Def not my cup of tea...but it is what it is!!!

Runscott · #7 05-31-2013, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan

I don't personally see it, but maybe these printing error cards are just beginning to reach their potential (in terms of dollar value).

Such "freaks" are even more coveted in stamp and coin collecting, with a far greater premium paid for most examples. Here's one of the more famous ones...

Perhaps Baseball Error Cards are finally starting build some steam and catch up? I believe that these anomalies will become more valuable/desirable with each year that passes (and may not always be so thinly traded).

I have to admit, I do have a fondness for that stamp

Peter_Spaeth · #8 05-30-2013, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs

I would pay $45 for that card.

If I couldn't resell it, I wouldn't.

I think the value is principally social, largely driven by this forum and people talking each other up. Just my .02

T206Collector · #9 05-30-2013, 09:37 PM

I can follow y'all to a degree, of course. But I'd pay well over $1,000 for a signed E92 or E95 of anyone. Heck, I love my signed T201 collection.

It's parallel, but not the same thing.

martindl · #10 05-30-2013, 09:57 PM

Errors & pre-production ( scraps, tests, prototypes ) generally carry a hefty premium in most mass-produced collectible fields - stamps, coins, records, toys, books, etc. Why not cards?

Errors, tests and prototypes (proofs) have long carried a premium. I thinks it's a natural evolution that scraps would follow.

mrvster · #11 05-30-2013, 10:02 PM

I got halfway through this thread and couldn't read anymore....

I will put my reputation on the line here...

A card of such magnitude would bring 15 K plus in REA with more than 12 bidders at least....maybe 20 bidders...

I could care less what Scott, Peter, or any other hater would say....

Scott, your just pissed off you dumped them years ago for a song

.....hurts, but pull up the the big boy pants and move on....

Peace

JOHN VANDERBECK

Sean · #12 05-30-2013, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrvster

I got halfway through this thread and couldn't read anymore....

I will put my reputation on the line here...

A card of such magnitude would bring 15 K plus in REA with more than 12 bidders at least....maybe 20 bidders...

I could care less what Scott, Peter, or any other hater would say....

Scott, your just pissed off you dumped them years ago for a song

.....hurts, but pull up the the big boy pants and move on....

Peace

JOHN VANDERBECK

Johhny, no need to get riled. Some of us value scraps and errors, some don't. If everyone wanted them I couldn't afford them.

mrvster · #13 05-30-2013, 10:19 PM

It BOTHERS me to no end.....

I have to read constant Griping about the of ignorant board members putting down cards they HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE ABOUT....

uhhhh....is this a wst????

is this a bleed through???uhhhh...i'll give you $40 for it

DUH!!!

I'll take all of them for $45.00 each

SO I AGREE

SEND ME YOUR SCRAP!!!THEY ARE NO GOOD......THEY ARE WORTH ONLY PENNIES

email me and we can work something out

.....

These test scraps don't deserve to be in any ignorant collectors possession

JOHN VANDERBECK

JOHN VANDERBECK

Matthew H · #14 05-30-2013, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrvster

I got halfway through this thread and couldn't read anymore....

I will put my reputation on the line here...

A card of such magnitude would bring 15 K plus in REA with more than 12 bidders at least....maybe 20 bidders...

I could care less what Scott, Peter, or any other hater would say....

Scott, your just pissed off you dumped them years ago for a song

.....hurts, but pull up the the big boy pants and move on....

Peace

JOHN VANDERBECK

I don't doubt your analysis at all.... what would this card have brought in REA 4 years ago? All I'm saying is that it seems the more recent bidding pool has driven it to that level, and it's not a ton of guys, it's a few here...

mrvster · #15 05-30-2013, 10:51 PM

in all due respect, you have no clue about the market for these cards....

I have been getting blown up by collectors who didn't see the card, and they i'm sure would have gone balls to the wall, this card would have gone triple possibly.....find another one HA

YOU CAN"T

....and the "thin" market is quite "thickening" by the hour....I almost wish it wasn't occurring....these cards are well outta my reach now....I cannot afford the cards I love, yes it increases the value of my collection, but at this point I really don't care!!

I don't want to sell them(unless wags is around

)

Jamie, I haven't heard from you......

I know that card would have went nuts if you joined!!!

Runscott · #16 05-31-2013, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrvster

I got halfway through this thread and couldn't read anymore....

I will put my reputation on the line here...

A card of such magnitude would bring 15 K plus in REA with more than 12 bidders at least....maybe 20 bidders...

I could care less what Scott, Peter, or any other hater would say....

Scott, your just pissed off you dumped them years ago for a song

.....hurts, but pull up the the big boy pants and move on....

Peace

JOHN VANDERBECK

You've seen a lot of scrap, and that's great, but you also toss about huge numbers when discussing them. Since this is a discussion board, I'm discussing my thoughts about those numbers, and quite frankly - they are ridiculous. As far as 'big boy pants', you can take care of your own nether regions, and I'll take care of mine. Diapers, lederhosen - whatever turns you on - I won't say a word.

T206Collector · #17 05-30-2013, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MVSNYC

T206Collector- your philosophy doesn't hold water at all, IMO. you can't compare T206 to other sets. same question back at ya, can you compare signed T206's to signed 1950's Topps? no way. T206 is a special animal...you should know this.

If you have a 1953 Topps signed Satchel Paige or Jackie Robinson, I'd be happy to trade you a signed T206 for it.

Autographs are not everyone's cup of tea, but their interest level goes beyond signed T206 cards.

Printing anomolies in baseball cards spike wicked high on T206 -- why not other sets?

MVSNYC · #18 05-30-2013, 09:09 PM

The word is "sexy". plain and simple, T206 cards are sexier than any other set. you can't deny this, as you are a T206 "nut" yourself...you know what i mean. can't fully explain it, but the set has mucho sex appeal.

CW · #19 05-30-2013, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Collector

If you have a 1953 Topps signed Satchel Paige or Jackie Robinson, I'd be happy to trade you a signed T206 for it.

Autographs are not everyone's cup of tea, but their interest level goes beyond signed T206 cards.

Printing anomolies in baseball cards spike wicked high on T206 -- why not other sets?

Here's one way to look at it... you personally have offered $2500+ for any signed T206 not in your collection. Hypothetically, you'd pay over $2500 for a signed Harry Pattee card (likely much more), but if Mr. Pattee had signed a rare program or a vintage ticket, you would never pay that much for his signature. Part of it, as already mentioned, is the mystique of T206, and the crazy people that collect her.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Any Hunt auction winners from July 14th auction?	rickybulldog50	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	5	07-21-2009 11:44 PM
Hunt Auction Lot # 666	Archive	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	2	03-17-2008 12:14 AM
Hunt Auction Pickups	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	28	11-12-2007 08:41 PM
OT -- Anyone going to the Hunt Auction?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	2	11-05-2007 07:56 PM
Hunt auction...............	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	0	11-05-2004 01:41 PM