|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Or if there were two plates and one had a small flaw but the other didn't? How about if the plate was damaged and then replaced with a new one? Or if a completely different ink was used? Or a different type of cardboard? Yeah, a lot of what those Ebay guys find are printing mistakes. But there's a load of stuff that isn't. Sometimes it's hard to tell if it's a printing error, or just where in production a mistake happened. Was that bit of dust something that got into the press and stayed for maybe only a handful of sheets? Or was it in when the plate was exposed and every card fro that plate has the flaw. Or was it between the art and camera when the negative was taken and every card should have it but it got noticed and fixed? Just where do you draw the line? Aside from not knowing in some cases where a small error came from I have examples of all the stuff above. Some of it can't even be scanned. Like 93 Upper deck has 3 different sorts of back. All over gloss, gloss only on the photo, and gloss over the photo covered with a lighter overall layer. Obviously it was done as a deliberate change. I have an 81 fleer where there's a red line across part of the card. Not an ink smear, but from a scratch on the plate. Obviously not deliberate. Or this pair? Totally normal, but one is like the 62 green tints. Deliberate? Just a mistake? Steve B |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, not really...however, I did recently notice this print defect/variation. Missing borders on both sides.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Haha!!!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But then there are legitimate color variations, like the 1969 white letter cards. Since they have yellow in the mix elsewhere (photo of the player, etc.), that means the yellow was purposefully or accidentally eliminated from the part of the plate that included the name, etc. That's significant. Where it begins to tread into a tough gray area is when you take into account cards such as the 1967 Schaal green bat variation. Normally, I wouldn't consider this anything but a simple print error, because there were no deliberate changes made to the card, but it's been established as a true variation by the collecting community, so what can you do?
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 06-05-2013 at 03:53 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1961 Topps Baseball lot of 37 different | vintagetoppsguy | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 01-28-2013 08:58 PM |
| How many cards inside a 1961 Fleer Basketball unopened wax pack ? | probstein123 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 03-18-2011 09:12 PM |
| WTB: 1973 and 1975 Topps Baseball HOFERs Needs List Inside | vintagegem2 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-12-2011 06:44 PM |
| F/T: 1961 Topps baseball | SmokyBurgess | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 02-09-2011 08:41 AM |
| WTB 1961 Topps Baseball Lot | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 08-03-2007 03:12 PM |