 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-05-2013, 02:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Aloha! Dave. ps I prefer psa ( but I look closely for any paper loss). They are pretty much interchangeable as far as grades.
|
|
#2
07-05-2013, 02:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Welcome to the board Andy. I would say both companies have similar grading scales, for the most part. They each do things a bit differently but in the end are pretty close. Most of us concentrate more on the cards than the grades on the holders. We have all seen some 1s and 2s that look better than 3s and 4s. Happy collecting!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-05-2013 at 02:50 PM. Reason: typo
|
|
#4
07-05-2013, 06:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agree with the above comments. There are some tendencies of one company to focus on one element (eg corners, centering) vs another (eg paper loss, or surface wrinkles), and there's certainly variation within a particular company's grade. But by and large I find PSA and SGC grades fairly comparable.
Best of luck, and welcome aboard, --S
__________________
collecting T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, and 1952 Bowman. e-mails preferred over PM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Member Intro | VoodooChild | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-28-2013 06:52 PM |
| New member intro | Coninefan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-18-2013 11:45 AM |
| Excited new member - intro + a few questions | Pythonfactory | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 12-20-2012 01:11 AM |
| New Member Intro | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 11-27-2012 08:32 AM |
| New Member Intro - Jeff P | jefferyepayne | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 5 | 01-07-2012 06:30 AM |
Hybrid Mode
