![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patrick---I do not disagree with you that minor color variants in the printing process are not true variations, but some collectors still accumulate them and note the differences. To each their own.
Two good examples in the 52 set are the Crandall red v orange and the Feller clear lines or hazy. Neither is really a variation, but they have had hobby recognition among some avid 52 collectors for some time. Several of the cards in the H&G super set are of the minor color variant or stray ink dot variety. But they are recurring defects/differences and fun to run down anyway...if you have the inclination. In any event, you have to admire the effort and dedication that went into building that set |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Al,
Actually, I fall in the camp that the Feller and Crandall ARE variations. The Feller is very hard to spot - but I did finally get one that does not have lines and I have one that does have lines. The Crandall could be more subjective I suppose, but I do have a verion that is red (with a pale face) and orange (with a oranger - is that a word?) face. It's hard to tell unless you have both cards in hand though. And I also have the Baumholtz "variation" (and others). In all of the ones I have, it is an over abdunce of ink on the "variation" card that comes from being on the first sheet in a run. I do agree that folks are free to collect as they wish - I'm just trying to put out a caution that many of these colors variations are not a variant by design or intention, just rather based on when the card came off the run. Personally, I love the bolder colors of those cards that came off the first sheet(s) in the run. Some of them make the card look nicer in my opinion. But I still don't call it a variation. Cheers, Patrick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree with you completely. I have the two Fellers. Never have been able to find what I think are two distinct Crandalls. Since I look at these as unintended print differences they don't fit my personal definition definition of a variation, but I collect print errors and variants as well if they appeal to me...even if they are no more that what Doug likes to call "glorified print dots"
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The complete run of the alleged "Canadian" back cards that is included is a very impressive addition to this set.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see that this set starts bidding on Monday, starting at $25k. Any thoughts about what it will go for?
I talked to the auction house and they are going to display it at the National. Should be cool to see! If any of you visit it, I would be interested in your reactions. Last edited by tigerfan; 07-26-2013 at 06:08 PM. |
![]() |
Tags |
1952 topps |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Topps Super | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 08-05-2021 06:23 PM |
1952 Topps 312 Jackie Robinson PSA Graded Super Centering | jeff8877 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-05-2012 07:17 AM |
1952-1964 Topps HOFers and 1952 Topps High Numbers *NEW ADDITIONS--PRICES REDUCED* | poorlydrawncat | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-22-2012 12:44 PM |
Dixie Howell inscribed 1952 Topps+1952 Bowman Ending Sunday night | edtiques | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 06-19-2011 11:19 AM |
Exhibit, Topps Giant and Topps Super cards for sale. | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-14-2009 10:12 AM |