|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Robert acknowledged that both Carrigans have glue residue on the backs.
So why do the fronts of these cards look so different? Jantz |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Darn it Jantz, I now feel compelled to answer your question, too bad my peers will now lump me in with the long list of prior Net54ers who promise to never post again (yet continue to post) and threaten to leave the hobby (yet continue to post) due to a Wonkaticket barb.
Quote:
Robert also acknowledged that he was not sure if both cards were from the same collection. Plus, if you were a Doughboy in lets say 1917 and you ended-up with two T206 Carrigans; wouldn't only one of them be displayed in a picture frame or on top of your dresser, while the other might be safely tucked away in a scrapbook. Lovely Day... Last edited by iggyman; 08-08-2013 at 10:06 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTS: T206 Beck Missing Magenta | mrvster | T206 cards B/S/T | 2 | 06-06-2013 09:48 PM |
| WTS/WTT T206 Beck "Missing Magenta" ERROR | mrvster | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 04-28-2013 08:53 PM |
| 1989 Topps baseball missing magenta ink on reverse | betafolio2 | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 4 | 04-06-2012 10:21 PM |
| Nice vintage MLB collection found | judgebuck | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 14 | 01-17-2011 12:19 PM |
| large collection of photos found | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-16-2008 01:05 PM |