|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have no animosity towards anyone at all in this thread. I have a feeling that Legendary might do their scans normally at a higher resolution. So much so it makes the cards look different. I won the E221 Bishops card from them about a year or two ago, from the Drier collection. It looked bright and sharp with very few creases on it, from the scan on the screen. When I got it in hand it was quite different. It was darker and more creases showed. I still liked it and kept it....but before I got it I even told Mark Mac.rae, on the phone, I thought it looked almost Ex in condition. I felt kind of dumb when I got it and it was in fair (but still nice) condition. I think they need to change their settings on their scanners. I told Doug about it but still wanted the card. I am not saying they are doing anything bad, intentionally, but they do need to scan on different, more realistic settings. I like everyone over at Legendary, personally, and I hope everything gets worked out soon. best regards
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A little perspective and courtesy please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-01-2006 11:28 PM |
| 1914 CJ Mathewson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-15-2006 05:17 PM |
| The $1,300 bath - can someone explain this? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-07-2005 01:23 PM |
| 1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-13-2003 09:43 AM |
| 1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-23-2002 12:31 PM |