|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
"What I have done after my baseball career -- being able to help people with their lives and getting their lives back on track so they become productive human beings again -- that means more to me than all the things I did in baseball" - Don Newcombe https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/jgmp123 Last edited by jgmp123; 08-21-2013 at 06:09 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jim,
What I mean is this... 1) Sub forum of Autograph forum named "Autograph opinions" or similar. 2) Threads in sub-forum labeled by name of player 3) All requests for help and responses to those requests posted in that thread. 4) Using a Like/Dislike feature for each opinion request post to create a type of mini poll for each request in thread. Below each post it could read something like "X number of people liked this post" with a list of names "X number of people disliked this post" with a list of names 5) Responders can add a f/u post explaining their opinion in more detail if they desire. Yes. This would mean that good and bad would be mixed together, but I don't think it would be cumbersome at all. As of right now, if you want to research Mantle, you have to open every separate thread and read a bunch of posts to understand if the general opinion of the board about the item in question is good or bad. I think going to one thread that has good and bad mixed with a mini poll beneath each stating whether the consensus is good or bad would have way more utility. I think seeing the bad ones is just as important as seeing the good ones when learning about judging autographs. To James' point, I also think each post will likely get more responses using the Like/Dislike feature. It's easy to see how many views each post has, yet for various reasons, only a few may actually respond. A quick yes/no option would allow people to respond quickly and easily. I just think a full exemplar section, while a great idea, has too many challenges to pull off well without someone willing to dedicate a large chunk of time to administer it.
__________________
My signed 1934 Goudey set(in progress). https://flic.kr/s/aHsjFuyogy Other interests/sets/collectibles. https://www.flickr.com/photos/96571220@N08/albums My for sale or trade photobucket album https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7c1SRL Last edited by Lordstan; 08-21-2013 at 11:21 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
50% of th inquiries on the board regarding "is this authentic?" are the big 3 so to start there with those three guys would make the most sense.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Exemplar Players' League Autographs | ngrow9 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 6 | 06-06-2013 08:48 AM |
| Exemplar Needed - Winston Brown | btcarfagno | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 04-29-2013 04:35 PM |
| 1967 Master Reference File of Packard Bell's 1967 sponsorship of the L.A. Dodgers | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 05-25-2008 05:46 PM |
| 1967 Master Reference File of Packard Bell's 1967 sponsorship of the L.A. Dodgers | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 05-25-2008 05:44 PM |
| Whoever is keeping the file for stupid mislabeled cards.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-15-2007 08:08 PM |