 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-24-2013, 05:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Evidence of E90-1 being printed before E102
It doesn't prove anything of the kind. Johnny Siegle hadn't played for the Reds since 1906. Does that prove it's a 1907 issue? Not at all. It just proves that American Caramel missed a few. It don't doubt your hypothesis about the E102s, but nothing you've said proves that E90-1 was a 1908 issue. It may have been a very late 1908 issue, but I'm not aware of any conclusive evidence to prove this.
__________________
Please visit my website at http://t206.monkberry.com/index.html 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The evidence against Barry Halper is mounting | slidekellyslide | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 63 | 01-18-2011 07:41 AM |
| Evidence of trimming | kylebicking | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-04-2010 04:03 PM |
| Leon, I will post evidence this evening | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-01-2008 10:47 PM |
| The Evidence as Promised | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2008 07:02 PM |
| evidence of trimming vs. cut short | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-08-2005 04:18 PM |
Hybrid Mode
