The Response

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by D.P.Johnson

+1.
The guy is brilliant.

I said it in the other thread, but I want to say it again here too just to be clear. Some of this information I was able to come up with on my own, however a lot was sent to me via PM and email from many other sources (some of which really surprised me). I certainly don't want to take credit when others helped me out a lot. I think they wish to remain anonymous, but they're more than welcome to chime in and take credit where credit is due.

[CharleyBrown]

This guy is as arrogant as they come. Not only does he demand that the other thread's title be changed (as if he should have a say one way or the other), but then he comes here and makes his own thread proclaiming himself to be holier than thou.

He didn't address any of the issues specifically, but gave some generic reasoning that he really seems to believe makes everything okay.

Something stinks in here

-
S.haun F.yffe

[D.P.Johnson]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

I said it in the other thread, but I want to say it again here too just to be clear. Some of this information I was able to come up with on my own, however a lot was sent to me via PM and email from many other sources (some of which really surprised me). I certainly don't want to take credit when others helped me out a lot. I think they wish to remain anonymous, but they're more than welcome to chime in and take credit where credit is due.

You're putting it all together and making it very easy to understand. That's not easy to do. I truly appreciate the work you're putting into this and also would like to thank those that have assisted you. Kudos!

[Cardboard Junkie]

Joe:

[Thirteen]

If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

and if she weighs the same as a duck then....

[AMBST95]

Originally Posted by Thirteen

If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

and if she weighs the same as a duck then....

She's a witch!

[Peter_Spaeth]

The differences in the O'Rourke along the right border are pretty dramatic, I doubt a scanner could account for them especially as the scans seems to be at the same settings otherwise.

[calvindog]

You're getting sued too.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by calvindog

You're getting sued too.

I know one lawyer not to call.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

The differences in the O'Rourke along the right border are pretty dramatic, I doubt a scanner could account for them especially as the scans seems to be at the same settings otherwise.

Exactly. Here are the two side by side for comparison. What happened to all the blue print marks? If they were scanned by 2 different scanners, that might account for some of it, but they were both scanned by Probstein and I doubt he changed the scanner settings.

Note: I reduced the size of the images. If you go back to the thread and look at the supersized images, it's even more obvious.

[MattyC]

Curiously, the flip is whiter/brighter in the 8 scan. Is it safe to assume PSA used the same paper stock for both of those flips?

[Leon]

Everyone will need their first and last name by their post(s) in this thread or in their sig line etc..., if it isn't there already etc. If their full name isn't in there, they can edit their comments out, put their name in the post or I will put their name in it. . Nothing personal. Thanks everyone.