|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ken, your response was very straight-forward and answered my questions perfectly. There is too much tap-dancing when it comes to issues like this, so hearing a response like this was refreshing and very much appreciated - thanks.
edited to add: it sounds like the two Ruth bats I posted were very misleading and could very well have been sold to people who thought they were buying bats actually used in games by Babe Ruth. That really sucks.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 09-01-2013 at 09:40 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Glad it is appreciated
the other thing you need to look out for, is a 'Babe Ruth pro model' bat that was USED BY A DIFFERENT PLAYER being sold as 'Babe Ruth professional model bat' and in description says 'shows game use'. This is why Goldin AUctions posts every LOA for everyone to read. In PSA/DNA LOAs, for example, you can actually see things like 'bat shows use but was not used by xxx player' meaning: A different player ordered someone elses model bat and used it. so it is indeed an xxx model bat, game used...but not used by the named player. typically the price dictates it as the true players know the score. In all cases, you really need to SEE and READ the LOA. They will normally detail everything. in Game used bats, an 'auth' or an 'A5' typically means it is a pro model bat, with no link to the player named on the bat (ie, a Mickey mantle model bat that was used by Billy Martin....and I mention that example because one was recently offered ...) |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yep, and knowing that there are plenty of true players on top of all the good bats, I watch with interest and curiosity, but seldom play. I have one super-fantastic bat and that will probably be it, unless I have a wealthy relative that I'm unaware of.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
My rhetorical tap dancing was strictly due to my high level of ignorance. Usually my fancy words and colorful language cover it from view.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I actually posed this exact question to the people at Mears last week prior to the end of the auction. I had an interest in several of the bats but didn't go above my initial qualifying bid.
Me email to Mears was: I'm curious why this bat is only listed as having been authenticated, but was not graded? Or are these two separate services you offer for consigned bats. Thanks Mark This is the reply I received: Sometimes for lower grade bats, we just issue the authentic grade. I would assume this bat is a 5 or 6. troy Its a little bit of an ambiguous answer and one I didn't feel comfortable with bidding on the bats with. The specific bat I questioned was the 1921-31 Goose Goslin Game Used Bat which they listed as Authentic. If you go by the reply I received and Mears' grading standards, an A5 grade denotes a bat that matches factory records for the specific player and labeling period and is considered being a "from the bat rack" with no visible signs of use. However the Goslin auction listing clearly states "Bat currently measures 35.5", weighs 36 ounces and shows heavy use with ball marks, stitch marks and an area of deadwood on the reverse of the barrel" So evidence of heavy use would, by their grading standards push the bat higher than A5 grade and you would think with a Game Used bat from a HOFer they would chose to do a full grade designation and not just an "Authentic" grade. Something just did not add up for me and I decided to not pursue any of the Authentic bats. It seems they're contradicting their own grading and authentication standards. On one hand the auction title says Game Used Bat and the description mentions heavy use, but the grade of "Authentic" and the potential of the bat actually grading out at an A5 (as per the email reply from Mears) which does NOT it seem to guarantee game usage, but rather that it was in fact only a game issued bat, are contradictory. I haven't acquire a gamer yet for my collection. Though they intrigue me to no end! While I always enjoy following all the auctions, researching the subject and increasing my knowledge of game used bats, its instances and situations like this that give me pause when I consider going for one. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
...and thanks to Mark and Mark for providing additional information.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If they have graded the item previously, there's no such conflict. But if a consignor comes in with a really great ungraded piece and the auction house knows it can jack the hammer amount by assigning a high grade... Well, I'm just saying, I think it's a sign of integrity when they don't do that. If I had such an item, I'd do this: First, I'd get it graded. Then, considering their opinion, the grade they gave it, and the post-grading estimated value of the item, I'd go ahead and consign it. That, to me, is the right way to do things, better ensures an unbiased grade, and thus keeps the entire process 100% honest. -Mark III |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT-Authentic Trimmed or Authentic Restored | Taxman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-28-2012 10:31 AM |
| Mears authentication? | Moesalty | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-18-2011 02:00 PM |
| Mears | BBSD | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 13 | 03-02-2011 04:17 PM |
| MEARS Winnings | sayhey24 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 13 | 02-17-2011 12:23 AM |
| Authentic/Altered vs Authentic/Beaten Cards | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-20-2010 11:17 PM |